ArticleBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine2013
Perspectives on promoting breastmilk feedings for premature infants during a quality improvement project.
Article in Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Financial Support to Medicaid-Eligible Mothers Increases Caregiving for Preterm Infants.Maternal and child health journal · 2020Trial
- Multi-prong quality improvement approach for increasing mother's own milk use for very low birth weight infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- Lactation support in neonatal intensive care units in Germany from the mothers' perspective - a mixed-method study of the current status and needs.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- NEC-zero recommendations from scoping review of evidence to prevent and foster timely recognition of necrotizing enterocolitis.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017Review
- Increasing recruitment rates in an inpatient clinical research study using quality improvement methods.Hospital pediatrics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigated clinicians' perspectives during a quality improvement project to promote breastmilk feedings in premature infants. STUDY
designFrom 2009 to 2010, 11 hospitals in the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative participated in a project to promote breastmilk feedings in premature infants. Audio recordings of monthly meetings held to encourage sharing of ideas were analyzed using qualitative methods to identify common themes related to barriers and solutions to breastmilk feeding promotion.
resultsTwo broad categories were noted: communication and team composition. Communication subthemes included (1) communication among hospital staff, including consistent documentation, (2) communication with family, and (3) communication between transfer hospitals. Team composition subthemes included (4) importance of physician buy-in and (5) integrated teams designed to empower leaders.
conclusionsOptimizing communication among health professionals and parents and improving team composition may be key components of facilitating breastmilk feeding promotion in premature infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.