Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23185978›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2012

Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ.

Allison Tong, Kate Flemming, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Oliver, Jonathan Craig

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07284238 (Process of Configuring the Suicidal Ideation Framework), which is not on this map. Cited by 1,449 papers, 108 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,449citing papers in PubMed, 108 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07284238 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Process of Configuring the Suicidal Ideation Framework: A Grounded Theory Study in Catalonia, Spain

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2026 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsSuicide, Suicide Attempt, Suicide Ideation, Suicide RiskArmsIn-Depth Qualitative Interview, Discussion Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,449 citing papers in PubMed, 108 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Young bodies, aging ovaries: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of women's perspectives on spontaneous premature ovarian insufficiency.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transition From Child to Adult Eating Disorder Services: A Qualitative Meta-Aggregation.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. The perceptions of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation decision-making in patients with hematologic malignancies: a qualitative systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Primary care practitioners' experiences managing urinary tract infections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Financial toxicity among families of children with cancer: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. The Patient's Voice in Advanced Practice Nursing: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Lived Experiences.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

1,389 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison Tong
Kate Flemming
Elizabeth McInnes
Sandy Oliver
Jonathan Craig

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe syntheses of multiple qualitative studies can pull together data across different contexts, generate new theoretical or conceptual models, identify research gaps, and provide evidence for the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions. This study aims to develop a framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search for guidance and reviews relevant to the synthesis of qualitative research, methodology papers, and published syntheses of qualitative health research in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and relevant organisational websites to May 2011. Initial items were generated inductively from guides to synthesizing qualitative health research. The preliminary checklist was piloted against forty published syntheses of qualitative research, purposively selected to capture a range of year of publication, methods and methodologies, and health topics. We removed items that were duplicated, impractical to assess, and rephrased items for clarity.

resultsThe Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (ENTREQ) statement consists of 21 items grouped into five main domains: introduction, methods and methodology, literature search and selection, appraisal, and synthesis of findings.

conclusionsThe ENTREQ statement can help researchers to report the stages most commonly associated with the synthesis of qualitative health research: searching and selecting qualitative research, quality appraisal, and methods for synthesising qualitative findings. The synthesis of qualitative research is an expanding and evolving methodological area and we would value feedback from all stakeholders for the continued development and extension of the ENTREQ statement.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchQualitative ResearchResearch DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID23185978
PMCPMC3552766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.