Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23185561›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Flow sorting and molecular cytogenetic identification of individual chromosomes of Dasypyrum villosum L. (H. villosa) by a single DNA probe.

Valentina Grosso, Anna Farina, Andrea Gennaro, Debora Giorgi, Sergio Lucretti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Flow karyotyping of wheat-Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  6. Chromosome analysis and sorting.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Flow cytometric chromosome sorting from diploid progenitors of bread wheat, T. urartu, Ae. speltoides and Ae. tauschii.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentina GrossoENEA, CASACCIA Research Center, Rome, Italy.
Anna Farina
Andrea Gennaro
Debora Giorgi
Sergio Lucretti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dasypyrum villosum (L.) Candargy (sin. Haynaldia villosa) is an annual wild diploid grass species (2n = 2x = 14; genome VV) belonging to the Poaceae family, which is considered to be an important source of biotic and abiotic stress resistance genes for wheat breeding. Enhanced characterization of D. villosum chromosomes can facilitate exploitation of its gene pool and its use in wheat breeding programs. Here we present the cytogenetic identification of D. villosum chromosomes on slide by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), with the GAA simple sequence repeat (SSR) as a probe. We also describe the isolation and the flow cytometric analysis of D. villosum chromosomes in suspension, resulting in a distinguished flow karyotype. Chromosomes were flow sorted into three fractions, according their DNA content, one of which was composed of a single type of chromosome, namely 6 V, sorted with over 85% purity. Chromosome 6 V is known to carry genes to code for important resistance and seed storage characteristics, and its isolation represents a new source of genetic traits and specific markers useful for wheat improvement.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantChromosomes, PlantDNA, PlantDNA ProbesFlow CytometryHybridization, GeneticIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMicrosatellite RepeatsPloidiesPoaceaeTriticumDNA, PlantDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID23185561
PMCPMC3502404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.