Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23185494›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Influence of architecture of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds on biological performance in repairing segmental bone defects.

Ya-Fei Feng, Lin Wang, Xiang Li, Zhen-Sheng Ma, Yang Zhang, Zhi-Yong Zhang, Wei Lei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bone substitutes and implantation depths for subchondral bone repair in osteochondral defects of porcine knee joints.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ya-Fei FengDepartment of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lin Wang
Xiang Li
Zhen-Sheng Ma
Yang Zhang
Zhi-Yong Zhang
Wei Lei
Air Force Medical University · CNXijing Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNState Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough three-dimensional (3D) β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds serve as promising bone graft substitutes for the segmental bone defect treatment, no consensus has been achieved regarding their optimal 3D architecture.

methodsIn this study, we has systematically compared four types of β-TCP bone graft substitutes with different 3D architectures, including two types of porous scaffolds, one type of tubular scaffolds and one type of solid scaffolds, for their efficacy in treating segmental bone defect in a rabbit model.

resultsOur study has demonstrated that when compared to the traditional porous and solid scaffolds, tubular scaffolds promoted significantly higher amount of new bone formation in the defect regions as shown by X-ray, micro CT examinations and histological analysis, restored much greater mechanical properties of the damaged bone evidenced by the biomechanical testing, and eventually achieved the complete union of segmental defect. Moreover, the implantation of tubular scaffolds enhanced the neo-vascularization at the defect region with higher bone metabolic activities than others, as indicated by the bone scintigraphy assay.

conclusionsThis study has further the current knowledge regarding the profound influence of overall 3D architecture of β-TCP scaffolds on their in vivo defect healing performance and illuminated the promising potential use of tubular scaffolds as effective bone graft substitute in treating large segmental bone defects.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesBone TransplantationCalcium PhosphatesAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBone DensityBone RegenerationPlastic Surgery ProceduresPorosityRabbitsStromal CellsWound Healingbeta-tricalcium phosphateBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesCalcium Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID23185494
PMCPMC3503864
OpenAlexW2027578917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.