ArticlePloS one2012
Longitudinal investigation of public trust in institutions relative to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Switzerland.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review on the association of COVID-19-related conspiracy belief with infection-preventive behavior and vaccination willingness.BMC psychology · 2022Pooled it
- The Yearlong Effect of COVID-19 on Food Safety: Consumer Practices and Perceptions Using Longitudinal Consumer Surveys and Focus Groups.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effective Communication Within and Across Public Health Institutions: A Qualitative Study in Switzerland.International journal of public health · 2025Article
- Trust, trust repair, and public health: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Psychological Factors of Vaccination Intent among Healthcare Providers, Parents, and Laypeople.Vaccines · 2023Article
- COVID-19 vaccination acceptance, safety and side-effects in European patients with severe asthma.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Why people were less compliant with public health regulations during the second wave of the Covid-19 outbreak: The role of trust in governmental organizations, future anxiety, fatigue, and Covid-19 risk perception.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Trust in COVID-19 public health information.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2022Article
- The effect of COVID-19 on public confidence in the World Health Organization: a natural experiment among 40 countries.Globalization and health · 2022Article
- Vaccination Hesitancy and Conspiracy Beliefs in the UK During the SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) Pandemic.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Article
- Can Fear of COVID-19 Be Predicted by Religiosity and Trust in Institutions among Young Adults? A Prospective Cross-National Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Awareness, knowledge and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among the people of West Bengal, India: A web-based survey.Vacunas · 2022Article
- Psychosocial Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccination Intention Among White, Black, and Hispanic Adults in the US.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022Article
- Predictors of healthcare workers' intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: A cross sectional study from Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
- Dynamics in public perceptions and media coverage during an ongoing outbreak of meningococcal W disease in the Netherlands.BMC public health · 2022Article
- The Salience of Trust to the Client-Provider Relationship in Post-Ebola Guinea: Findings From a Qualitative Study.Global health, science and practice · 2022Article
- What Is the Support for Conspiracy Beliefs About COVID-19 Vaccines in Latin America? A Prospective Exploratory Study in 13 Countries.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Political attitude change over time following COVID-19 lockdown: Rallying effects and differences between left and right voters.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Beliefs and Barriers to COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in Three Countries with Different Human Development Index (HDI) Scores: A Comparative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2009 H1N1 pandemic left a legacy of mistrust in the public relative to how outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases are managed. To prepare for future outbreaks, it is crucial to explore the phenomenon of public trust in the institutions responsible for managing disease outbreaks. We investigated the evolution of public trust in institutions during and after the 2009 pandemic in Switzerland. We also explored respondents' perceptions of the prevention campaign and the roles of the government and media. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsA two-wave longitudinal survey was mailed to 2,400 members of the Swiss public. Wave 1 was in Spring 2009. Wave 2 was in Spring 2010. Six hundred and two participants responded in both waves. Participants indicated moderate to high levels of trust in medical organizations, the WHO, the Swiss government, the pharmaceutical industry, and the EU. On the other hand, trust in the media was low. Moreover, trust in almost all institutions decreased over time. Participants were satisfied with the amount of information received and indicated having followed official recommendations, but widespread concerns about the vaccine were evident. A large majority of participants agreed the vaccine might have unknown or undesirable side effects. Perceptions of the government's and the media's role in handling the outbreak were characterized by a substantial degree of skepticism and mistrust. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Results show clear patterns of skepticism and mistrust on the part of the public relative to various institutions and their actions. Results underscore the importance of systematically investigating trust of the public relative to epidemics. Moreover, studies investigating the evolution of the public's memories of the pandemic over the coming years may be important to understand reactions to future pandemics. A systematic research program on trust can inform public health communication campaigns, enabling tailored communication initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.