ArticlePloS one2012
Interactogeneous: disease gene prioritization using heterogeneous networks and full topology scores.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel candidate disease gene prioritization method using deep graph convolutional networks and semi-supervised learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- A method for estimating coherence of molecular mechanisms in major human disease and traits.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Seeking Windows of Opportunity to Shape Lifelong Immune Health: A Network-Based Strategy to Predict and Prioritize Markers of Early Life Immune Modulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Article
- Predicting links between tumor samples and genes using 2-Layered graph based diffusion approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Constructing an integrated gene similarity network for the identification of disease genes.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017Article
- Jumping across biomedical contexts using compressive data fusion.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- A Novel Prioritization Method in Identifying Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism-Related Genes.PloS one · 2016Article
- Heterogeneous Network Edge Prediction: A Data Integration Approach to Prioritize Disease-Associated Genes.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- ProSim: A Method for Prioritizing Disease Genes Based on Protein Proximity and Disease Similarity.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Determining microbial products and identifying molecular targets in the human microbiome.Cell metabolism · 2014Review
- Quantification of biological network perturbations for mechanistic insight and diagnostics using two-layer causal models.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- An extensive analysis of disease-gene associations using network integration and fast kernel-based gene prioritization methods.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2014Article
- MitProNet: A knowledgebase and analysis platform of proteome, interactome and diseases for mammalian mitochondria.PloS one · 2014Article
- Pathway analyses and understanding disease associations.Current genetic medicine reports · 2013Article
- Network and data integration for biomarker signature discovery via network smoothed T-statistics.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disease gene prioritization aims to suggest potential implications of genes in disease susceptibility. Often accomplished in a guilt-by-association scheme, promising candidates are sorted according to their relatedness to known disease genes. Network-based methods have been successfully exploiting this concept by capturing the interaction of genes or proteins into a score. Nonetheless, most current approaches yield at least some of the following limitations: (1) networks comprise only curated physical interactions leading to poor genome coverage and density, and bias toward a particular source; (2) scores focus on adjacencies (direct links) or the most direct paths (shortest paths) within a constrained neighborhood around the disease genes, ignoring potentially informative indirect paths; (3) global clustering is widely applied to partition the network in an unsupervised manner, attributing little importance to prior knowledge; (4) confidence weights and their contribution to edge differentiation and ranking reliability are often disregarded. We hypothesize that network-based prioritization related to local clustering on graphs and considering full topology of weighted gene association networks integrating heterogeneous sources should overcome the above challenges. We term such a strategy Interactogeneous. We conducted cross-validation tests to assess the impact of network sources, alternative path inclusion and confidence weights on the prioritization of putative genes for 29 diseases. Heat diffusion ranking proved the best prioritization method overall, increasing the gap to neighborhood and shortest paths scores mostly on single source networks. Heterogeneous associations consistently delivered superior performance over single source data across the majority of methods. Results on the contribution of confidence weights were inconclusive. Finally, the best Interactogeneous strategy, heat diffusion ranking and associations from the STRING database, was used to prioritize genes for Parkinson's disease. This method effectively recovered known genes and uncovered interesting candidates which could be linked to pathogenic mechanisms of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.