Trial reportPloS one2012
Effect of high- versus low-intensity supervised aerobic and resistance training on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes; the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES).
Trial report in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Vigorous Exercise Versus Moderate Exercise to Improve Glucose Metabolism and Metabolic Parameters in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Insulin Resistance: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study
Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Non Weight-bearing Physical Activity Program for People With Diabetic Foot Ulceration (DB ACTIV)
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lifestyle changes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Physical activity recommendations for patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey.Acta diabetologica · 2020Pooled it
- Anthropometric, Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Benefits of the High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate, Low-Intensity or Control for Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Dietary program and physical activity impact on biochemical markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.Atencion primaria · 2018Pooled it
- Physical Exercise on Inflammatory Markers in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2017Pooled it
- Dietary restriction and exercise for diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Effects of different exercise modalities on novel hepatic steatosis indices in overweight women with type 2 diabetes.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2019Trial
- Effects of 24-Week Aerobic and Resistance Training on Carotid Artery Intima-Media Thickness and Flow Velocity in Elderly Women with Sarcopenic Obesity.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2017Trial
- Safety of aerobic exercise in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: single-group clinical trial.Physical therapy · 2015Trial
- Effect of moderate-intensity exercise versus activities of daily living on 24-hour blood glucose homeostasis in male patients with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes care · 2013Trial
- Post-Diagnosis Decline in Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity Is Associated with Higher Triglyceride and Fasting Glucose Levels in Newly Diagnosed Diabetes: A National Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Intervention effect of combined resistance and aerobic exercise on type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- High-Intensity Interval Training Decreases Circulating HMGB1 in Individuals with Insulin Resistance: Plasma Lipidomics Correlate with Associated Cardiometabolic Benefits.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Physical Activity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2025Review
- Identifying exercise and cognitive intervention parameters to optimize executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024Article
- The analysis of the skeletal muscle metabolism is crucial for designing optimal exercise paradigms in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Article
- The Interconnection Between Muscle and Bone: A Common Clinical Management Pathway.Calcified tissue international · 2024Review
- Physical Activity and Type 2 Diabetes: In Search of a Personalized Approach to Improving β-Cell Function.Nutrients · 2023Review
- The importance of exercise for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.American journal of medicine open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile current recommendations on exercise type and volume have strong experimental bases, there is no clear evidence from large-sized studies indicating whether increasing training intensity provides additional benefits to subjects with type 2 diabetes.
objectiveTo compare the effects of moderate-to-high intensity (HI) versus low-to-moderate intensity (LI) training of equal energy cost, i.e. exercise volume, on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.
designPre-specified sub-analysis of the Italian Diabetes and Exercise Study (IDES), a randomized multicenter prospective trial comparing a supervised exercise intervention with standard care for 12 months (2005-2006).
settingTwenty-two outpatient diabetes clinics across Italy. PATIENTS: Sedentary patients with type 2 diabetes assigned to twice-a-week supervised progressive aerobic and resistance training plus exercise counseling (n = 303).
interventionsSubjects were randomized by center to LI (n = 142, 136 completed) or HI (n = 161, 152 completed) progressive aerobic and resistance training, i.e. at 55% or 70% of predicted maximal oxygen consumption and at 60% or 80% of predicted 1-Repetition Maximum, respectively, of equal volume. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hemoglobin (Hb) A(1c) and other cardiovascular risk factors; 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk scores.
resultsVolume of physical activity, both supervised and non-supervised, was similar in LI and HI participants. Compared with LI training, HI training produced only clinically marginal, though statistically significant, improvements in HbA(1c) (mean difference -0.17% [95% confidence interval -0.44,0.10], P = 0.03), triglycerides (-0.12 mmol/l [-0.34,0.10], P = 0.02) and total cholesterol (-0.24 mmol/l [-0.46, -0.01], P = 0.04), but not in other risk factors and CHD risk scores. However, intensity was not an independent predictor of reduction of any of these parameters. Adverse event rate was similar in HI and LI subjects.
conclusionsData from the large IDES cohort indicate that, in low-fitness individuals such as sedentary subjects with type 2 diabetes, increasing exercise intensity is not harmful, but does not provide additional benefits on cardiovascular risk factors.
trial registrationwww.ISRCTN.org ISRCTN-04252749.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.