ArticlePloS one2012
Exploiting genomic knowledge in optimising molecular breeding programmes: algorithms from evolutionary computing.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- How far can you go? Extrapolating values of catalytic activity from known protein landscapes in natural and directed evolution.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- A gene selection algorithm for microarray cancer classification using an improved particle swarm optimization.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety: A Decade Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes.eLife · 2022Article
- Intelligent host engineering for metabolic flux optimisation in biotechnology.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- Strategies to Assure Optimal Trade-Offs Among Competing Objectives for the Genetic Improvement of Soybean.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Evolutionary algorithms and synthetic biology for directed evolution: commentary on "on the mapping of genotype to phenotype in evolutionary algorithms" by Peter A. Whigham, Grant Dick, and James Maclaurin.Genetic programming and evolvable machines · 2017Article
- Island-Model Genomic Selection for Long-Term Genetic Improvement of Autogamous Crops.PloS one · 2016Article
- Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently.Chemical Society reviews · 2015Review
- The virtue of innovation: innovation through the lenses of biological evolution.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2015Article
- Article
- A novel strategy for gene selection of microarray data based on gene-to-class sensitivity information.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparatively few studies have addressed directly the question of quantifying the benefits to be had from using molecular genetic markers in experimental breeding programmes (e.g. for improved crops and livestock), nor the question of which organisms should be mated with each other to best effect. We argue that this requires in silico modelling, an approach for which there is a large literature in the field of evolutionary computation (EC), but which has not really been applied in this way to experimental breeding programmes. EC seeks to optimise measurable outcomes (phenotypic fitnesses) by optimising in silico the mutation, recombination and selection regimes that are used. We review some of the approaches from EC, and compare experimentally, using a biologically relevant in silico landscape, some algorithms that have knowledge of where they are in the (genotypic) search space (G-algorithms) with some (albeit well-tuned ones) that do not (F-algorithms). For the present kinds of landscapes, F- and G-algorithms were broadly comparable in quality and effectiveness, although we recognise that the G-algorithms were not equipped with any 'prior knowledge' of epistatic pathway interactions. This use of algorithms based on machine learning has important implications for the optimisation of experimental breeding programmes in the post-genomic era when we shall potentially have access to the full genome sequence of every organism in a breeding population. The non-proprietary code that we have used is made freely available (via Supplementary information).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.