ArticlePloS one2012
De novo origin of protein-coding genes in murine rodents.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- DetectNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Improved sampling of genotypes and species reveals new insights on de novo gene history and regulatory origins.Genetics · 2025Article
- Genomic landscape of repetitive DNAs in Neotropical electric fishes.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025Article
- Functional innovation through new genes as a general evolutionary process.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- The ribosome profiling landscape of yeast reveals a high diversity in pervasive translation.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Identifying candidate de novo genes expressed in the somatic female reproductive tract of Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Identifying candidatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The Origins and Functions of De Novo Genes: Against All Odds?Journal of molecular evolution · 2022Review
- Population biology of accessory gland-expressed de novo genes in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2022Article
- New Genes Interacted With Recent Whole-Genome Duplicates in the Fast Stem Growth of Bamboos.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Intergenic ORFs as elementary structural modules of de novo gene birth and protein evolution.Genome research · 2021Article
- Conversion of DNA Sequences: From a Transposable Element to a Tandem Repeat or to a Gene.Genes · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
- De novo gene birth.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- From De Novo to "De Nono": The Majority of Novel Protein-Coding Genes Identified with Phylostratigraphy Are Old Genes or Recent Duplicates.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Review
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Transcript-Supported De Novo Genes in Saccharomyces sensu stricto Yeasts.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
- New Genes and Functional Innovation in Mammals.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Open questions in the study of de novo genes: what, how and why.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNew genes in eukaryotes are created through a variety of different mechanisms. De novo origin from non-coding DNA is a mechanism that has recently gained attention. So far, de novo genes have been described in a handful of organisms, with Drosophila being the most extensively studied. We searched for genes that have appeared de novo in the mouse and rat lineages. METHODOLOGY: Using a rigorous and conservative approach we identify 75 murine genes (69 mouse genes and 6 rat genes) for which there is good evidence of de novo origin since the divergence of mouse and rat. Each of these genes is only found in either the mouse or rat lineages, with no candidate orthologs nor evidence for potentially-unannotated orthologs in the other lineage. The veracity of each of these genes is supported by expression evidence. Additionally, their presence in one lineage and absence in the other cannot be explained by sequencing gaps. For 11 of the 75 candidate novel genes we could identify a mouse-specific mutation that led to the creation of the open reading frame (ORF) specifically in mouse. None of the six rat-specific genes had an unequivocal rat-specific mutation creating the ORF, which may at least be partly due to lower data quality for that genome.
conclusionsAll 75 candidate genes presented in this study are relatively small and encode short peptides. A large number of them (51 out of 69 mouse genes and 3 out of 6 rat genes) also overlap with other genes, either within introns, or on the opposite strand. These characteristics have previously been documented for de novo genes. The description of these genes opens up the opportunity to integrate this evolutionary analysis with the rich experimental data available for these two model organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.