ArticlePloS one2012
Resolving discrepancy between nucleotides and amino acids in deep-level arthropod phylogenomics: differentiating serine codons in 21-amino-acid models.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Pooled it
- The evolutionary path of widespread IR heteroplasmy of chloroplast genomes in the context of Rhodophyta phylogeny.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Article
- Unraveling myriapod evolution: sealion, a novel quartet-based approach for evaluating phylogenetic uncertainty.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Arthropod Phylotranscriptomics With a Special Focus on the Basal Phylogeny of the Myriapoda.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Mitochondrial Genomes of Chloropidae and Their Implications for the Phylogeny of the Family.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Museomics unveil systematics, diversity and evolution of Australian cycad-pollinating weevils.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial phylogenomics provides insights into the phylogeny and evolution of spiders (Arthropoda: Araneae).Zoological research · 2022Article
- Novel mitochondrial gene rearrangements pattern in the millipedeEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Systematics and Plastome Evolution in Schizaeaceae.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Reinvestigating the phylogeny of Myriapoda with more extensive taxon sampling and novel genetic perspective.PeerJ · 2021Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome sequence ofPeerJ · 2021Article
- Four myriapod relatives - but who are sisters? No end to debates on relationships among the four major myriapod subgroups.BMC evolutionary biology · 2020Article
- Improving Phylogenetic Signals of Mitochondrial Genes Using a New Method of Codon Degeneration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- ExtensiveProceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Major Revisions in Arthropod Phylogeny Through Improved Supermatrix, With Support for Two Possible Waves of Land Invasion by Chelicerates.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020Article
- LMAP_S: Lightweight Multigene Alignment and Phylogeny eStimation.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Phylogenomics reveals the evolutionary timing and pattern of butterflies and moths.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Article
- The Mitochondrial Genomes of Phytophagous Scarab Beetles and Systematic Implications.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2018Article
- Phylogenomics illuminates the backbone of the Myriapoda Tree of Life and reconciles morphological and molecular phylogenies.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a previous study of higher-level arthropod phylogeny, analyses of nucleotide sequences from 62 protein-coding nuclear genes for 80 panarthopod species yielded significantly higher bootstrap support for selected nodes than did amino acids. This study investigates the cause of that discrepancy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThe hypothesis is tested that failure to distinguish the serine residues encoded by two disjunct clusters of codons (TCN, AGY) in amino acid analyses leads to this discrepancy. In one test, the two clusters of serine codons (Ser1, Ser2) are conceptually translated as separate amino acids. Analysis of the resulting 21-amino-acid data matrix shows striking increases in bootstrap support, in some cases matching that in nucleotide analyses. In a second approach, nucleotide and 20-amino-acid data sets are artificially altered through targeted deletions, modifications, and replacements, revealing the pivotal contributions of distinct Ser1 and Ser2 codons. We confirm that previous methods of coding nonsynonymous nucleotide change are robust and computationally efficient by introducing two new degeneracy coding methods. We demonstrate for degeneracy coding that neither compositional heterogeneity at the level of nucleotides nor codon usage bias between Ser1 and Ser2 clusters of codons (or their separately coded amino acids) is a major source of non-phylogenetic signal.
conclusionsThe incongruity in support between amino-acid and nucleotide analyses of the forementioned arthropod data set is resolved by showing that "standard" 20-amino-acid analyses yield lower node support specifically when serine provides crucial signal. Separate coding of Ser1 and Ser2 residues yields support commensurate with that found by degenerated nucleotides, without introducing phylogenetic artifacts. While exclusion of all serine data leads to reduced support for serine-sensitive nodes, these nodes are still recovered in the ML topology, indicating that the enhanced signal from Ser1 and Ser2 is not qualitatively different from that of the other amino acids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.