ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013
Statistical method for comparing the level of intracellular organization between cells.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesenchymal Wnts are required for morphogenetic movements of calvarial osteoblasts during apical expansion.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Apical expansion of calvarial osteoblasts and suture patency is dependent on fibronectin cues.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Spatial modeling of biological patterns shows multiscale organization of Arabidopsis thaliana heterochromatin.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Point process models for localization and interdependence of punctate cellular structures.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Systems level approaches to analyzing complex emergent behavior require quantitative characterization of alterations of behavior on both the microscale and macroscale. Here we consider the problem of cellular organization and describe a statistical methodology for quantitative comparison of the internal organization between different populations of similar physical objects, such as cells. This comparison is achieved with several steps of analysis. Starting with three-dimensional or two-dimensional images of cells, images are segmented to identify individual cells. Locations of internal points of interest, such as organelles or proteins, are recorded. To define the configuration of internal points in each cell, the individual cells are subjected to bounded Voronoi tessellation: subdividing the bounded volume or area of the cell into subvolumes determined by the locations of the internal points of interest. A statistical methodology is applied to yield a metric for similarity in degree of organization between populations. We applied this methodology to test whether centrioles play a role in global cellular organization, using mutants of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with known alterations in centriole number, structure, and position as a model system. Comparing mutant populations and wild-type populations revealed a dramatic difference in the degree of organization in the mutant strains. These computational and experimental results provide statistical support for prior observational studies and support the idea that centrioles play a role in generating or maintaining global cellular organization. Our results confirm that this method can be used to sensitively compare the extent and type of organization within cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.