ArticleProteomics2013
An artificial neural network approach to improving the correlation between protein energetics and the backbone structure.
Article in Proteomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in structural bioinformatics: current applications and future perspectives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Application of Machine Learning to Sleep Stage Classification.Proceedings. International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence · 2021Article
- Dynafold: a dynamic programming approach to protein backbone structure determination from minimal sets of Residual Dipolar Couplings.Journal of bioinformatics and computational biology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Computational approaches to modeling protein structures have made significant advances over the past decade. However, the current limitation in modeling protein structures is to produce protein structures consistently below the limit of 6 Å compared to their native structure. Therefore, improvement of protein structures consistently below the 6 Å limit using simulation of biophysical forces is of significant interest. Current protein force fields such as those implemented in CHARMM, AMBER, and NAMD have been deemed complete, yet their use in ab initio approaches to protein structure determination has been unsuccessful. Here, we introduce a new approach in evaluation of protein structures based on analysis of energy profiles produced by the SCOPE software package. The latest version of SCOPE produces a hydrogen bond profile that is substantially more informative than a single hydrogen bond energy value. We demonstrate how analysis of SCOPE's energy profile by an artificial neural network shows a significant improvement compared to the traditional force-based approaches to evaluation of structures. The artificial neural network based analysis of SCOPE's energy profile showed identification of structures to within the range of 1.5-3.0 Å of the native structure. These results have been obtained by testing structures in the same Homology, Topology, Architecture, or Class of the CATH family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.