Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23184569›Full record

Trial reportClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2013

Effect of spironolactone and amiloride on thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention in South Indian patients with type 2 diabetes.

Vijay Viswanathan, Viswanathan Mohan, Poongothai Subramani, Nandakumar Parthasarathy, Gayathri Subramaniyam, Deepa Manoharan, Chandru Sundaramoorthy, Luigi Gnudi, Janaka Karalliedde, Giancarlo Viberti

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vijay ViswanathanDepartment of Diabetes, M.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Prof M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India.
Viswanathan Mohan
Poongothai Subramani
Nandakumar Parthasarathy
Gayathri Subramaniyam
Deepa Manoharan
Chandru Sundaramoorthy
Luigi Gnudi
Janaka Karalliedde
Giancarlo Viberti
Madras Diabetes Research Foundation · INUniversity of Cambridge · GBDr. Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre · INM.V. Hospital for Diabetes and Diabetes Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) induce renal epithelial sodium channel (ENaC)-mediated sodium reabsorption, resulting in plasma volume (PV) expansion. Incidence and long-term management of fluid retention induced by thiazolidinediones remain unclear. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a 4-week run-in period, rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, was added to a background anti-diabetic therapy in 260 South Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with PV expansion (absolute reduction in hematocrit in run-in, ≥1.5 percentage points) entered a randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate effects of amiloride and spironolactone on attenuating rosiglitazone-induced fluid retention. Primary endpoint was change in hematocrit in each diuretic group versus placebo (control group).

resultsOf the 260 patients, 70% (n=180) had PV expansion. These 180 patients (70% male; mean age, 47.8 years [range, 30-80 years]) were randomly assigned to rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, plus spironolactone, 50 mg once daily; rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, plus amiloride, 10 mg once daily; or rosiglitazone, 4 mg twice daily, plus placebo for 24 weeks. Hematocrit continued to decrease significantly in control and spironolactone groups (mean absolute change, -1.2 [P=0.01] and -0.7 [P=0.02] percentage points, respectively), suggesting continued PV expansion. No change occurred with amiloride (mean change, 0.0 percentage points). Amiloride, but not spironolactone, was superior to control (mean hematocrit difference [95% confidence interval] relative to control, 1.27 [0.21-2.55] and 0.49 [-0.79-1.77] percentage points [P=0.04 and P=0.61], respectively).

conclusionsPrevalence of rosiglitazone-induced fluid retention in South Indian patients with type 2 diabetes is high. Amiloride, a direct ENaC blocker, but not spironolactone, prevented protracted fluid retention in these patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmilorideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DiureticsEdemaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRosiglitazoneSpironolactoneThiazolidinedionesAmilorideDiureticsRosiglitazoneSpironolactoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID23184569
PMCPMC3562862
OpenAlexW2120124567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.