ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2013
Electron transfer and collision induced dissociation of non-derivatized and derivatized desmosine and isodesmosine.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics in Translational Research.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Elastin is heterogeneously cross-linked.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
- Fingerprinting desmosine-containing elastin peptides.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electron transfer dissociation (ETD) has attracted increasing interest due to its complementarity to collision-induced dissociation (CID). ETD allows the direct localization of labile post-translational modifications, which is of main interest in proteomics where differences and similarities between ETD and CID have been widely studied. However, due to the fact that ETD requires precursor ions to carry at least two charges, little is known about differences in ETD and CID of small molecules such as metabolites. In this work, ETD and CID of desmosine (DES) and isodesmosine (IDS), two isomers that due to the presence of a pyridinium group can carry two charges after protonation, are studied and compared. In addition, the influence of DES/IDS derivatization with propionic anhydride and polyethyleneglycol (PEG) reagents on ETD and CID was studied, since this is a common strategy to increase sensitivity and to facilitate the analysis by reversed-phase chromatography. Clear differences between ETD and CID of non-derivatized and derivatized-DES/IDS were observed. While CID is mainly attributable to charge-directed fragmentation, ETD is initiated by the generation of a hydrogen atom at the initial protonation site and its subsequent transfer to the pyridinium ring of DES/IDS. These differences are reflected in the generation of complex CID spectra dominated by the loss of small, noninformative molecules (NH(3), CO, H(2)O), while ETD spectra are simpler and dominated by characteristic side-chain losses. This constitutes a potential advantage of ETD in comparison to CID when employed for the targeted analysis of DES/IDS in biological samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.