Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23184245›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2013

Study of quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging in the diagnosis of breast tumours.

Zhi Li Wang, Jun Lai Li, Min Li, Yan Huang, Wen Bo Wan, Jie Tang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhi Li WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China. wangzhililg@126.com
Jun Lai Li
Min Li
Yan Huang
Wen Bo Wan
Jie Tang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study was undertaken to evaluate the value of quantitative elastography in the diagnosis of breast tumours. MATERIALS AND

methodsConventional ultrasound (US) and quantitative elastography were performed in 108 women with 114 breast lesions by two experienced radiologists, and pathological results were available in all cases. For each lesion, the maximum, mean, and minimum (min) elasticity and elasticity ratio between lesions and surrounding tissue were measured. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories were assessed with conventional US in all lesions.

resultsMalignant lesions exhibited significantly higher maximum and mean elasticity (111.57 ± 69.29 kPa and 54.49 ± 33.70 kPa) than did benign lesions (59.00 ± 45.3 kPa and 36.64 ± 26.18 kPa) (p<0.01). For maximum elasticity versus BI-RADS, performance results were sensitivity 60.9 % vs. 78.3%, specificity 85.3% vs. 98.5%, positive predictive value (PPV) 73.7% vs. 97.3 %, negative predictive value (NPV) 76.3% vs. 87.0 % and accuracy 75.4% vs. 90.3%. BI-RADS had significantly better accuracy than maximum elasticity (p<0.01). Maximum and mean elasticity of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were significantly higher than those of fibroadenoma (p<0.01), whereas the difference was not statistically significant with fibroadenosis, papilloma and inflammation (p>0.01). Maximum and mean elasticity and elasticity ratio of BI-RADS 5 were all significantly higher than those of BI-RADS 3 (p<0.01). Reliability for maximum and mean elasticity were almost perfect [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)=0.87 and 0.79].

conclusionsShear-wave elastography gives quantitative elasticity information that could potentially help in breast-lesion characterisation, although it cannot replace conventional BI-RADS in the differentiation of breast lesions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.