Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23184210›Full record

ReviewClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2012

Quality of life measurements in patients with osteoporosis and fractures.

Melisa M Madureira, Rozana M Ciconelli, Rosa M R Pereira

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04873960 (Translation of ECOS-16 Questionnaire in Urdu Language; Validity and Reliability Analysis in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04873960 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Translation of ECOS-16 Questionnaire in Urdu Language; Validity and Reliability Analysis in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia

TypeobservationalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsPostmenopausal Osteopenia, Quality of Life, Validity, Reliability
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: a systematic review of measurement properties of the QUALEFFO-41.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Patient education in osteoporosis prevention: a systematic review focusing on methodological quality of randomised controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for osteoporotic vertebral fracture-a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation (PROVE trial).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dietary Behaviors, Serum 25(OH)D Levels and Quality of Life in Women with Osteoporotic Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on bone health among breast cancer patients. Does it require intervention?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoporosis: data from the population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melisa M MadureiraBone Laboratory Metabolism, Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. melisamadureira@uol.com.br
Rozana M Ciconelli
Rosa M R Pereira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To review all specific questionnaires regarding quality of life in osteoporosis and to describe their distinctive indications, we searched Medline, the Scientific Electronic Library Online database, and the Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database. Nine specific questionnaires related to osteoporosis quality of life were found: 1) the Women's Health Questionnaire, 2) Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire, 3) Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire, 4) Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire, 5) Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis, 6) Osteoporosis-Targeted Quality of Life Questionnaire, 7) Japanese Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire, 8) the 16-item Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Osteoporosis, and 9) the Quality of Life Questionnaire in Osteoporosis (QUALIOST™). The Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis is the osteoporosis-specific questionnaire most commonly used in the literature. The Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the Osteoporosis Quality of Life Questionnaire are targeted more toward fracture assessment, and the Osteoporosis Functional Disability Questionnaire can be used for longitudinal studies involving exercise. In the present study, the authors summarize all of the specific questionnaires for osteoporosis and demonstrate that these questionnaires should be selected based on the objectives to be evaluated. Osteoporosis-specific quality of life questionnaires should be validated in the language of the country of origin before being used.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeFractures, BoneHumansOsteoporosisResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23184210
PMCPMC3488992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.