Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23184089›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2013

microRNA-independent recruitment of Argonaute 1 to nanos mRNA through the Smaug RNA-binding protein.

Benjamin D Pinder, Craig A Smibert

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Structural basis for binding ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Modulation of miRISC-Mediated Gene Silencing in Eukaryotes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Translational repression of theRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin D PinderDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Craig A Smibert
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Argonaute (Ago) proteins are typically recruited to target messenger RNAs via an associated small RNA such as a microRNA (miRNA). Here, we describe a new mechanism of Ago recruitment through the Drosophila Smaug RNA-binding protein. We show that Smaug interacts with the Ago1 protein, and that Ago1 interacts with and is required for the translational repression of the Smaug target, nanos mRNA. The Ago1/nanos mRNA interaction does not require a miRNA, but it does require Smaug. Taken together, our data suggest a model whereby Smaug directly recruits Ago1 to nanos mRNA in a miRNA-independent manner, thereby repressing translation.

Indexed as

AnimalsArgonaute ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGene Expression RegulationMicroRNAsProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionAGO1 protein, DrosophilaArgonaute ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsMicroRNAsnos protein, DrosophilaRepressor ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messengersmg protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID23184089
PMCPMC3537145
OpenAlexW2112135680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.