Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23184002›Full record

SynthesisMolecular biology reports2013

Quantitative assessment of the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and hemorrhagic stroke risk.

Xianlin Zhao, Hongzhou Jiang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xianlin ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, No. 4 Chongshan East Road, Huanggu District, Shenyang City 110032, Liaoning province, China. xianlinzhao@rocketmail.com
Hongzhou Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have investigated the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and hemorrhagic stroke, but the impact of MTHFR C677T on hemorrhagic stroke is unclear owing to the obvious inconsistence among those studies. This study aimed to quantify the strength of the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and hemorrhagic stroke risk. We searched Pubmed, Emabse and Wangfang databases for studies investigating the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and hemorrhagic stroke risk. We estimated the pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) to assess this possible association. Meta-analysis of included studies suggested that TT genotype was obviously associated with increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke (OR (TT versus CC) = 1.84, 95 % CI 1.45-2.34; OR (TT versus CT) = 1.53, 95 % CI 1.23-1.90; OR (TT versus CT/CC) = 1.64, 95 % CI 1.24-2.00) compared with CC or CT genotypes of MTHFR C677T polymorphism. Subgroup analyses by ethnicity further identified the association above in both Asians and Caucasians. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Thus, meta-analyses of available data suggest an obvious association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and hemorrhagic stroke risk, and TT genotype contributes to increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticAllelesGenotypeHumansMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Odds RatioPublication BiasRiskStrokeMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)MTHFR protein, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.