ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2012
Molecular evolution of teleost neural isozymes.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isozymes, homologous enzymes coded by separate loci within a genome, present interesting systems for examining molecular and functional divergence through natural selection. Isozyme pairs for a number of metabolic enzymes, including Triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi), Malate dehydrogenase (Mdh), Phosphoglucose isomerase (Pgi), and Guanylate kinase (Guk), appear to all result from a single, large duplication event early in teleost evolution. These small gene families include two forms, a generally expressed form with no apparent charge and a neurally expressed form with a pronounced negative charge although the canalization of expression of the second form varies across families. Using ancestral sequence reconstructions and standard comparisons of rates of nonsynonymous and synonymous change, combined with the examination of the specific amino acid changes observed and predicted we examined the evolution of the Tpi and Guk families using all available vertebrate sequences and all four families using a smaller, common, dataset. We find that post-duplication, the neural Tpi and Guk isozymes evolved through similar periods of positive selection as evidenced by elevated rates of nonsynonymous change and accumulation of negative amino acids. Over the same evolutionary period our analysis suggests that Mdh and Pgi isozymes appear to have evolved under a less divergent pattern of selection. These distinct results likely reflect functional differences between the isozymes, possibly a result of differences in expression patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.