Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23183435›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

In vitro interaction of voriconazole and anidulafungin against triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus.

Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi, Joseph Meletiadis, Willem J G Melchers, Antonius J M M Rijs, Johan W Mouton, Paul E Verweij

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillosis in 2019.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Seyedmojtaba SeyedmousaviDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Joseph Meletiadis
Willem J G Melchers
Antonius J M M Rijs
Johan W Mouton
Paul E Verweij
Nijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voriconazole is the recommended drug of first choice to treat infections caused by Aspergillus fumigatus. The efficacy of voriconazole might be hampered by the emergence of azole resistance. However, the combination of voriconazole with anidulafungin could improve therapeutic outcomes in azole-resistant invasive aspergillosis (IA). The in vitro interaction between voriconazole and anidulafungin was determined against voriconazole-susceptible and voriconazole-resistant (substitutions in the cyp51A gene, including single point [M220I and G54W] and tandem repeat [34-bp tandem repeat in the promoter region of the cyp51A gene in combination with substitutions at codon L98 and 46-bp tandem repeat in the promoter region of the cyp51A gene in combination with mutation at codons Y121 and T289] mutations) clinical A. fumigatus isolates using a checkerboard microdilution method with spectrophotometric analysis and a viability-based XTT {2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide} assay within 2 h of exposure after 24 and 48 h of incubation at 35 °C to 37 °C. Fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) indexes (FICis) were determined using different MIC endpoints and Bliss independence analysis performed based on the response surface calculation of the no-drug interaction. Significant synergistic interactions obtained based on measuring the FIC index were dependent on the MIC endpoint, in which FICs were inversely related to voriconazole and anidulafungin MICs and were influenced by the CYP51A genotype. A statistically significant difference was observed between FIC indexes of isolates harboring tandem repeat mutations and wild-type controls (P = 0.006 by one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA]), indicating that synergy is decreased in azole-resistant strains. Our results indicated that a combination of voriconazole and anidulafungin might be effective against infections caused by both azole-susceptible and azole-resistant A. fumigatus isolates, but the combination could possibly be less effective in voriconazole-resistant strains with high MICs. Studies in vivo and in vitro-in vivo correlation investigations are required to validate the potential synergy of voriconazole and anidulafungin.

Indexed as

AnidulafunginAntifungal AgentsAspergillus fumigatusCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrug InteractionsDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPoint MutationPromoter Regions, GeneticPyrimidinesTandem Repeat SequencesTriazolesVoriconazoleAnidulafunginAntifungal Agentscytochrome P-450 CYP51A, AspergillusCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsPyrimidinesTriazolesVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID23183435
PMCPMC3553723
OpenAlexW2137149687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.