Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23183140›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2013

The bacterial cytoskeleton: more than twisted filaments.

Martin Pilhofer, Grant J Jensen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mic60 exhibits a coordinated clustered distribution along and across yeast and mammalian mitochondria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Four-stranded mini microtubules formed byProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Collaborative protein filaments.The EMBO journal · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Martin PilhoferHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E California Blvd, M/C 114-96, Pasadena, CA, USA. martin-pilhofer@web.de
Grant J Jensen

Funding

Structure and function of the prokaryotic cytoskeleton by electron cryotomographyR01GM094800 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JENSEN, GRANT J · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094800NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094800B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Far from being simple 'bags' of enzymes, bacteria are richly endowed with ultrastructures that challenge and expand standard definitions of the cytoskeleton. Here we review rods, rings, twisted pairs, tubes, sheets, spirals, moving patches, meshes and composites, and suggest defining the term 'bacterial cytoskeleton' as all cytoplasmic protein filaments and their superstructures that move or scaffold (stabilize/position/recruit) other cellular materials. The evolution of each superstructure has been driven by specific functional requirements. As a result, while homologous proteins with different functions have evolved to form surprisingly divergent superstructures, those of unrelated proteins with similar functions have converged.

Indexed as

BacteriaCytoskeletonHumansMicrotubules

Identifiers

PMID23183140
PMCPMC3597445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.