Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23182350›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2013

Templated agarose scaffolds for the support of motor axon regeneration into sites of complete spinal cord transection.

Mingyong Gao, Paul Lu, Bridget Bednark, Dan Lynam, James M Conner, Jeff Sakamoto, Mark H Tuszynski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Research Progress on Biomaterials for Spinal Cord Repair.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Application of Biomaterials in Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 3D Printed Neural Regeneration Devices.Advanced functional materials · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mingyong GaoDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Paul Lu
Bridget Bednark
Dan Lynam
James M Conner
Jeff Sakamoto
Mark H Tuszynski
University of California, San Diego · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Bioengineered Scaffolds for Spinal Cord InjuryR01EB014986 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SAKAMOTO, JEFFREY, TUSZYNSKI, MARK H. · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014986NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB014986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioengineered scaffolds have the potential to support and guide injured axons after spinal cord injury, contributing to neural repair. In previous studies we have reported that templated agarose scaffolds can be fabricated into precise linear arrays and implanted into the partially injured spinal cord, organizing growth and enhancing the distance over which local spinal cord axons and ascending sensory axons extend into a lesion site. However, most human injuries are severe, sparing only thin rims of spinal cord tissue in the margins of a lesion site. Accordingly, in the present study we examined whether template agarose scaffolds seeded with bone marrow stromal cells secreting Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) would support regeneration into severe, complete spinal cord transection sites. Moreover, we tested responses of motor axon populations originating from the brainstem. We find that templated agarose scaffolds support motor axon regeneration into a severe spinal cord injury model and organize axons into fascicles of highly linear configuration. BDNF significantly enhances axonal growth. Collectively, these findings support the feasibility of scaffold implantation for enhancing central regeneration after even severe central nervous system injury.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsAxonsBiocompatible MaterialsCell EnlargementEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleGuided Tissue RegenerationMolecular ImprintingMotor NeuronsNerve RegenerationRatsRats, Inbred F344SepharoseSpinal Cord InjuriesBiocompatible MaterialsSepharose

Identifiers

PMID23182350
PMCPMC3518618
OpenAlexW2052219290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.