Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23182074›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2013

Viral diagnostics in the era of digital polymerase chain reaction.

Ruth Hall Sedlak, Keith R Jerome

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Nucleic Acid Testing of SARS-CoV-2.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Digital Droplet PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Resolves Borderline Cases.American journal of clinical pathology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruth Hall SedlakDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Keith R Jerome

Funding

ZFN-Modified Stem Cells for HIV EradicationU19AI096111 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI JEROME, KEITH R · 2011 to 2015
$20.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI096111NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI96111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), digital PCR (dPCR) achieves sensitive and accurate absolute quantitation of a DNA sample without the need for a standard curve. A single PCR reaction is divided into many separate reactions that each have a positive or negative signal. By applying Poisson statistics, the number of DNA molecules in the original sample is directly calculated from the number of positive and negative reactions. The recent availability of multiple commercial dPCR platforms has led to increased interest in clinical diagnostic applications, such as low viral load detection and low abundance mutant detection, where dPCR could be superior to traditional qPCR. Here we review current literature that demonstrates dPCR's potential utility in viral diagnostics, particularly through absolute quantification of target DNA sequences and rare mutant allele detection.

Indexed as

HumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionVirus DiseasesViruses

Identifiers

PMID23182074
PMCPMC3519953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.