Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23181979›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2013

Hospice use among nursing home patients.

Kathleen Tschantz Unroe, Greg A Sachs, Susan E Hickman, Timothy E Stump, Wanzhu Tu, Christopher M Callahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Hospice use among nursing home and non-nursing home patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Emergency Department Use Among Older Adults With Dementia.Alzheimer disease and associated disorders
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathleen Tschantz UnroeIndiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. kunroe@iupui.edu
Greg A Sachs
Susan E Hickman
Timothy E Stump
Wanzhu Tu
Christopher M Callahan

Funding

Patient-Oriented Research to Improve Geriatric Care-K24K24AG024078 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2004 to 2013
$1.4M
MODELING ALZHEIMER DISEASE COSTS AND TRANSITIONSR01AG031222 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CALLAHAN, CHRISTOPHER M · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG024078NIA NIH HHS R01 AG031222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAmong hospice patients who lived in nursing homes, we sought to: (1) report trends in hospice use over time, (2) describe factors associated with very long hospice stays (>6 months), and (3) describe hospice utilization patterns. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe conducted a retrospective study from an urban, Midwest cohort of hospice patients, aged ≥ 65 years, who lived in nursing homes between 1999 and 2008. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and health care utilization were collected from Medicare claims, Medicaid claims, and Minimum Data Set assessments. Patients with overlapping nursing home and hospice stays were identified. χ(2) and t tests were used to compare patients with less than or longer than a 6-month hospice stay. Logistic regression was used to model the likelihood of being on hospice longer than 6 months.

resultsA total of 1452 patients received hospice services while living in nursing homes. The proportion of patients with noncancer primary hospice diagnoses increased over time; the mean length of hospice stay (114 days) remained high throughout the 10-year period. More than 90% of all patients had 3 or more comorbid diagnoses. Nearly 20% of patients had hospice stays longer than 6 months. The hospice patients with stays longer than 6 months were observed to have a smaller percentage of cancer (25% vs 30%) as a primary hospice diagnosis. The two groups did not differ by mean cognitive status scores, number of comorbidities, or activities of daily living impairments. The greater than 6 months group was much more likely to disenroll before death: 33.9% compared with 13.8% (P < .0001). A variety of patterns of utilization of hospice across settings were observed; 21% of patients spent some of their hospice stay in the community.

conclusionsAny policy proposals that impact the hospice benefit in nursing homes should take into account the difficulty in predicting the clinical course of these patients, varying utilization patterns and transitions across settings, and the importance of supporting multiple approaches for delivery of palliative care in this setting.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHome Care AgenciesHospice CareHospicesHumansInpatientsInterdisciplinary CommunicationLength of StayMaleMedicareNursing HomesPalliative Care

Identifiers

PMID23181979
PMCPMC3820369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.