Trial reportBMC pediatrics2012
Oral cleft prevention program (OCPP).
Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00397917 (Oral Cleft Prevention Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Oral Cleft Prevention Program
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association between IRF6 and 8q24 polymorphisms and nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2016Pooled it
- Vitamin supplementation for preventing miscarriage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Effects and safety of periconceptional oral folate supplementation for preventing birth defects.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- High dosage folic acid supplementation, oral cleft recurrence and fetal growth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013Trial
- Hypodontia as an extended phenotype in families with nonsyndromic oral clefts: findings from a 39-family clinical cohort.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2026Observational
- Treatment outcomes of two surgical techniques in secondary reconstruction of unilateral cleft lip and ala nasi utilizing anthropometry assessment: a randomized controlled trial.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
- Effects of preconception care and periconception interventions on maternal nutritional status and birth outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2021Review
- Machine learning in prediction of genetic risk of nonsyndromic oral clefts in the Brazilian population.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- The Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research: A model of capacity-building research.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2015Review
- Is MTHFD1 polymorphism rs 2236225 (c.1958G>A) associated with the susceptibility of NSCL/P? A systematic review and meta-analysis.F1000Research · 2015Article
- Oral clefting in china over the last decade: 205,679 patients.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2014Article
- Folic Acid Fortification and Women's Folate Levels in Selected Communities in Brazil - A First Look.International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition · 2014Article
- Oral cleft recurrence risk and subsequent maternal fertility preferences and behavior in Brazil.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral clefts are one of the most common birth defects with significant medical, psychosocial, and economic ramifications. Oral clefts have a complex etiology with genetic and environmental risk factors. There are suggestive results for decreased risks of cleft occurrence and recurrence with folic acid supplements taken at preconception and during pregnancy with a stronger evidence for higher than lower doses in preventing recurrence. Yet previous studies have suffered from considerable design limitations particularly non-randomization into treatment. There is also well-documented effectiveness for folic acid in preventing neural tube defect occurrence at 0.4 mg and recurrence with 4 mg. Given the substantial burden of clefting on the individual and the family and the supportive data for the effectiveness of folic acid supplementation as well as its low cost, a randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of high versus low dose folic acid for prevention of cleft recurrence is warranted. METHODS/
designThis study will assess the effect of 4 mg and 0.4 mg doses of folic acid, taken on a daily basis during preconception and up to 3 months of pregnancy by women who are at risk of having a child with nonsyndromic cleft lip with/without palate (NSCL/P), on the recurrence of NSCL/P. The total sample will include about 6,000 women (that either have NSCL/P or that have at least one child with NSCL/P) randomly assigned to the 4 mg and the 0.4 mg folic acid study groups. The study will also compare the recurrence rates of NSCL/P in the total sample of subjects, as well as the two study groups (4 mg, 0.4 mg) to that of a historical control group. The study has been approved by IRBs (ethics committees) of all involved sites. Results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at scientific meetings. DISCUSSION: The costs related to oral clefts are high, including long term psychological and socio-economic effects. This study provides an opportunity for huge savings in not only money but the overall quality of life. This may help establish more specific clinical guidelines for oral cleft prevention so that the intervention can be better tailored for at-risk women. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00397917.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.