Trial reportBMC cancer2012
CanPrevent: a telephone-delivered intervention to reduce multiple behavioural risk factors for colorectal cancer.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mapping psychosocial interventions in familial colorectal cancer: a rapid systematic review.BMC cancer · 2022Pooled it
- Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Quality of life and dietary changes among cancer patients: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015Pooled it
- Acceptability and Feasibility of a Mindfulness Intervention Delivered via Videoconferencing for People With Parkinson's.Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology · 2022Trial
- Effects of dietary and physical activity interventions on generic and cancer-specific health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression in colorectal cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020Trial
- Multicomponent mHealth Intervention for Large, Sustained Change in Multiple Diet and Activity Risk Behaviors: The Make Better Choices 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Trial
- Guided imagery targeting exercise, food cravings, and stress: a multi-modal randomized feasibility trial.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2018Trial
- Multicomponent Lifestyle Interventions During Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Identifying effective interventions to promote consumption of protein-rich foods from lower ecological footprint sources: A systematic literature review.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Estimates of future cancer mortality attributable to modifiable risk factors in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021Article
- Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Distant delivery of a mindfulness-based intervention for people with Parkinson's disease: the study protocol of a randomised pilot trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2017Article
- Psychological flexibility correlates with patient-reported outcomes independent of clinical or sociodemographic characteristics.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Psychosocial Mechanisms Linking the Social Environment to Mental Health in African Americans.PloS one · 2016Article
- Integrating genetic and genomic information into effective cancer care in diverse populations.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis pilot study aimed to test the acceptability and short-term effectiveness of a telephone-delivered multiple health behaviour change intervention for relatives of colorectal cancer survivors.
methodsA community-based sample of 22 first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer survivors were recruited via a media release. Data were collected at baseline and at six weeks (post-intervention). Outcome measures included health behaviours (physical activity, television viewing, diet, alcohol, body mass index, waist circumference and smoking), health-related quality of life (Short Form-36) and perceived colorectal cancer risk. Intervention satisfaction levels were also measured. The intervention included six telephone health coaching sessions, a participant handbook and a pedometer. It focused on behavioural risk factors for colorectal cancer [physical activity, diet (red and processed meat consumption, fruit and vegetable intake), alcohol, weight management and smoking], and colorectal cancer risk.
resultsFrom baseline to six weeks, improvements were observed for minutes moderate-vigorous physical activity (150.7 minutes), processed meat intake (-1.2 serves/week), vegetable intake (1 serve/day), alcohol intake (-0.4 standard drinks/day), body mass index (-1.4 kg/m2), and waist circumference (-5.1 cm). Improvements were also observed for physical (3.3) and mental (4.4) health-related quality of life. Further, compared with baseline, participants were more likely to meet Australian recommendations post-intervention for: moderate-vigorous physical activity (27.3 vs 59.1%); fruit intake (68.2 vs 81.8%); vegetable intake (4.6 vs 18.2%); alcohol consumption (59.1 vs 72.7%); body mass index (31.8 vs 45.5%) and waist circumference (18.2 vs 27.3%). At six weeks participants were more likely to believe a diagnosis of CRC was related to family history, and there was a decrease in their perceived risk of developing CRC in their lifetime following participation in CanPrevent. The intervention retention rate was 100%, participants reported that it was highly acceptable and they would recommend it to others at risk of colorectal cancer.
conclusionsPositive behaviour change achieved through this intervention approach has the potential to impact on the progression of CRC and other cancers or chronic diseases. A large scale randomised controlled trial is required to confirm the positive results of this acceptability and short-term effectiveness study.
trial registrationACTRN12612000516886.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.