Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23181561›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2012

A common copy-number breakpoint of ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer colocalizes with a complex block of segmental duplications.

Michael Marotta, Xiongfong Chen, Ayako Inoshita, Robert Stephens, G Thomas Budd, Joseph P Crowe, Joanne Lyons, Anna Kondratova, Raymond Tubbs, Hisashi Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Functional Common and RareCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael Marotta
Xiongfong Chen
Ayako Inoshita
Robert Stephens
G Thomas Budd
Joseph P Crowe
Joanne Lyons
Anna Kondratova
Raymond Tubbs
Hisashi Tanaka
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USNational Cancer Institute · USScience Applications International Corporation (United States) · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Mechanisms of gene amplification in human cancersR01CA149385 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI TANAKA, HISASHI · 2010 to 2022
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149385NCI NIH HHS R01CA149385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSegmental duplications (low-copy repeats) are the recently duplicated genomic segments in the human genome that display nearly identical (> 90%) sequences and account for about 5% of euchromatic regions. In germline, duplicated segments mediate nonallelic homologous recombination and thus cause both non-disease-causing copy-number variants and genomic disorders. To what extent duplicated segments play a role in somatic DNA rearrangements in cancer remains elusive. Duplicated segments often cluster and form genomic blocks enriched with both direct and inverted repeats (complex genomic regions). Such complex regions could be fragile and play a mechanistic role in the amplification of the ERBB2 gene in breast tumors, because repeated sequences are known to initiate gene amplification in model systems.

methodsWe conducted polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays for primary breast tumors and analyzed publically available array-comparative genomic hybridization data to map a common copy-number breakpoint in ERBB2-amplified primary breast tumors. We further used molecular, bioinformatics, and population-genetics approaches to define duplication contents, structural variants, and haplotypes within the common breakpoint.

resultsWe found a large (> 300-kb) block of duplicated segments that was colocalized with a common-copy number breakpoint for ERBB2 amplification. The breakpoint that potentially initiated ERBB2 amplification localized in a region 1.5 megabases (Mb) on the telomeric side of ERBB2. The region is very complex, with extensive duplications of KRTAP genes, structural variants, and, as a result, a paucity of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Duplicated segments are varied in size and degree of sequence homology, indicating that duplications have occurred recurrently during genome evolution.

conclusionsAmplification of the ERBB2 gene in breast tumors is potentially initiated by a complex region that has unusual genomic features and thus requires rigorous, labor-intensive investigation. The haplotypes we provide could be useful to identify the potential association between the complex region and ERBB2 amplification.

Indexed as

Chromosome BreakpointsDNA Copy Number VariationsBase SequenceBreast NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 17Comparative Genomic HybridizationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationGene DosageGenome, HumanHaplotypesHumansKeratins, Hair-SpecificPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSegmental Duplications, GenomicERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKeratins, Hair-Specific

Identifiers

PMID23181561
PMCPMC4053137
OpenAlexW2002738091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.