Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23180995›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology practice2012

Barriers to the use of personalized medicine in breast cancer.

Christine B Weldon, Julia R Trosman, William J Gradishar, Al B Benson, Julian C Schink

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Disparities in OncotypeDx Testing and Subsequent Chemotherapy Receipt by Geography and Socioeconomic Status.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Grading of invasive breast carcinoma: the way forward.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Implementing Interventions with Varying Marginal Cost-Effectiveness: An Application in Precision Medicine.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical predictors of a positive test result in patients undergoing genetic evaluation for a hereditary kidney cancer syndrome.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine B WeldonCenter for Business Models in Healthcare, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Julia R Trosman
William J Gradishar
Al B Benson
Julian C Schink
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePersonalized medicine--the use of genomics and molecular diagnostics to direct care decisions--may improve outcomes by more accurately individualizing treatment to patients. Using qualitative research, we explored care delivery barriers to the use of personalized medicine for patients with breast cancer using examples of BRCA and gene expression profile testing.

methodsWe conducted 51 interviews with multidisciplinary stakeholders in breast cancer care: clinicians (n = 25) from three academic and nine nonacademic organizations, executives (n = 20) from four major private insurers, and patient advocates (n = 6).

resultsBarriers were common to the BRCA and gene expression profile tests and were classified under two categories: poor coordination of tests relative to treatment decisions and reimbursement-related disincentives. Perception of specific barriers varied across groups. Difficulty coordinating diagnostics relative to decisions was the most frequent concern by clinicians (60%), but only 35% of payers and 17% of advocates noted this barrier. For 60% of payers, drug- and procedure-based reimbursement was a significant barrier, but only 40% of clinicians and none of the advocates expressed the same concern. The opinion that patient out-of-pocket expenses are a barrier varied significantly between advocates and clinicians (83% v 20%, P < .007), and advocates and payers (83% v 15%, P < .004). Barriers were reported to result in postponement or avoidance of tests, delayed treatment decisions, and proceeding with decisions before test results.

conclusionPoorly coordinated diagnostic testing and the current oncology reimbursement model are barriers to the use of genomic and molecular diagnostic tests in cancer care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDelivery of Health CareBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDecision MakingFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPrecision MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID23180995
PMCPMC3396824
OpenAlexW2109682271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.