Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23180593›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology2013

Vasoactive exposures during pregnancy and risk of microtia.

Carla M Van Bennekom, Allen A Mitchell, Cynthia A Moore, Martha M Werler, National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Risk factors and demographics for microtia in South America: a case-control analysis.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2013
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carla M Van BennekomSlone Epidemiology Center at Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. cvanben@bu.edu
Allen A Mitchell
Cynthia A Moore
Martha M Werler
National Birth Defects Prevention Study
Boston University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · US

Funding

Massachusetts Center for Birth Defects Research and PreventionU01DD000493 · DD · MASSACHUSETTS STATE DEPT OF PUB HEALTH · PI ANDERKA, MARLENE, HOLMES, LEWIS B. · 2009 to 2013
$4.4M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD000493NCBDD CDC HHS U01DD000493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the etiology of nonsyndromic microtia. This study investigated the hypothesis that microtia is caused by vascular disruption.

methodsThe study analyzed data from the population-based National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) for deliveries between 1997 and 2005. Four hundred eleven nonsyndromic cases of microtia, with or without additional defects, were compared to 6560 nonmalformed infants with respect to maternal exposures to vasoactive medications and smoking during the periconceptional period and conditions that have previously been associated with vascular events (multiple gestation, maternal history of type 1, type 2, or gestational diabetes, and hypertension). Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with multivariable models, controlling for the effects of race/ethnicity, education, periconceptional folic acid use, and study center.

resultsRisk estimates for vasoactive medications and smoking were not meaningfully increased. Maternal type 1/2 diabetes was diagnosed before or during the index pregnancy in 4% and 1% of cases, respectively, compared to 1% and 0.05% of controls; the adjusted OR for these two groups combined was 7.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-13.1). Gestational diabetes was observed for 9% of cases and 6% of controls; the OR was moderately elevated (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0). ORs were also increased for multiple gestations (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.2) and pre-existing hypertension (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5).

conclusionsBecause ORs were only elevated for diabetes and not for vasoactive exposures or other potential vascular events, findings suggest that some microtia occurrences may be part of the diabetic embryopathy rather than manifestations of vascular disruption. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital MicrotiaDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes MellitusEarFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal ExposureOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy in DiabeticsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsCardiovascular Agents

Identifiers

PMID23180593
PMCPMC4521508
OpenAlexW1980936661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.