SynthesisClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2013
Analysis of economic evaluations of pharmacological cancer treatments in Spain between 1990 and 2010.
Synthesis in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Economic evaluation of pharmacological cancer treatment is a critical clinical problem currently under consideration worldwide. We have analysed their main characteristics in Spain between 1990 and 2010 following a systematic review of the 29 complete economic analyses published. The pathology most frequently evaluated was non-small cell lung cancer (31 %). Cost-effectiveness analyses (69 %) were the most frequent analyses. A wide range of incremental cost-effectiveness values (295-160,667 € /QALY) has been reported, and mostly are developed from the perspective of the National Health System (65.5 %). However, none of the studies estimated the indirect costs. The major conclusion is that the absence of regulations concerning the application of the efficiency criterion in decision-making on the subject of price and financing and, most importantly, the fact that these are not included in Spanish hospitals forms make it difficult to analyse the real impact of economic evaluations of cancer treatments on such decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23180344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.