Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179961›Full record

ArticlePituitary2013

Endoscopic endonasal approach for growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas: outcomes in 53 patients using 2010 consensus criteria for remission.

Samuel S Shin, Matthew J Tormenti, Alessandro Paluzzi, William E Rothfus, Yue-Fang Chang, Hanady Zainah, Juan C Fernandez-Miranda, Carl H Snyderman, Sue M Challinor, Paul A Gardner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03439709 (Multicenter Evaluation of the Effect of Upfront Radiosurgery on Residual Growth Hormone-secreting Pituitary Adenoma From an Endocrinological Point of View), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03439709 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Evaluation of the Effect of Upfront Radiosurgery on Residual Growth Hormone-secreting Pituitary Adenoma From an Endocrinological Point of View (MERGE Study): a Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsung Medical CenterRan2018 to 2022Enrolled90ConditionsAcromegaly Due to Pituitary AdenomaArmsGamma knife radiosurgery, Lanreotide 60Mg Solution for Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clinical assessment of patients with acromegaly.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samuel S ShinUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Matthew J Tormenti
Alessandro Paluzzi
William E Rothfus
Yue-Fang Chang
Hanady Zainah
Juan C Fernandez-Miranda
Carl H Snyderman
Sue M Challinor
Paul A Gardner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the outcomes of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for resection of growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas using 2010 consensus criteria. We also assess outcomes with additional medical therapy and radiosurgery (RS) for patients not achieving remission with EEA alone. A retrospective review of 53 patients who had follow up endocrinologic data at least 3 months post-surgery was performed among patients who were treated by EEA between 1998 and 2012. Data were analyzed for remission using GH and IGF-I levels based on 2010 consensus criteria. We also analyzed the outcomes using 2000 consensus criteria for ease in comparison to prior studies of outcomes of surgery for acromegaly. In this series of mostly large (88.2% macroadenomas), invasive (46.9% Hardy-Wilson C, D, E) adenomas, there were 27 patients (50.9%) who achieved remission after EEA only. For patients who had no remission with EEA alone, RS and/or medical therapy were used and 37 patients (69.8 %) achieved remission overall. Statistical analysis showed larger tumor size, Hardy Stages C, D, E and Knosp Scores 3, 4 to be predictive against remission for EEA only and EEA with other modalities. The volume of residual tumor after EEA was not found to be predictive of remission with additional therapies. We used stringent consensus criteria from 2010 in a series which included a high proportion of invasive GH secreting adenomas to show that EEA alone or combined with other modalities results in comparable remission rates to earlier studies which used less strict criteria, while retaining low complication rates.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdolescentAdultAgedConsensusFemaleGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.