Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179918›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2013

Comparative distribution of complex fractionated atrial electrograms, high dominant frequency (HDF) sites during atrial fibrillation and HDF sites during sinus rhythm.

Masayoshi Kofune, Yasuo Okumura, Ichiro Watanabe, Koichi Nagashima, Kazumasa Sonoda, Hiroaki Mano, Rikitake Kogawa, Naoko Sasaki, Kimie Ohkubo, Toshiko Nakai and 2 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Left atrial voltage mapping: defining and targeting the atrial fibrillation substrate.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masayoshi KofuneDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Ohyaguchi-kamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 173-8610.
Yasuo Okumura
Ichiro Watanabe
Koichi Nagashima
Kazumasa Sonoda
Hiroaki Mano
Rikitake Kogawa
Naoko Sasaki
Kimie Ohkubo
Toshiko Nakai
Mizuki Nikaido
Atsushi Hirayama
Nihon University · JPNihon Kohden (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComplex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) and high dominant frequency sites during atrial fibrillation (AF-HDF) are related to the maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). HDF sites in sinus rhythm (SR-HDF; as defined by frequencies of >70 Hz) are suggested to be abnormal atrial tissue. Relations between these electrophysiologic signals have not been elucidated.

methodsWe investigated the relations between SR-HDF and CFAE and AF-HDF sites during AF. NavX-based maps of CFAE and left atrium (LA)/pulmonary vein (PV) dominant frequency (DF) during AF and DF maps during SR were created for 23 patients with AF (paroxysmal AF (PAF), n = 14; persistent AF (PerAF), n = 9).

resultsThe extent of overlap between SR-HDF and CFAE sites was 51 ± 18 % (as calculated by the LA/PV segments containing both an SR-HDF site and a CFAE site/total LA/PV segments containing an CFAE site) and the extent of overlap between SR-HDF and AF-HDF sites was 50 ± 35 % (P = 0.7464). However, statistically poor agreement was noted for both (kappa values, 0.07 ± 0.19 and 0.08 ± 0.24, P = 0.8794). The extent of overlap did not differ between PAF and PerAF patients (SR-HDF and CFAE, 52 % (interquartile range (IQR), 42-59) versus 57 % (IQR, 33-67), P = 0.5842; SR-HDF and AF-HDF, 43 % (IQR, 25-85) versus 55 % (IQR, 13-83), P = 0.9465). The bipolar voltage amplitudes of SR-HDF, CFAE, and AF-HDF sites revealed normal voltage areas (1.6 mV (IQR, 0.8-2.7), 1.9 mV (IQR, 1.1-2.8), and 1.5 mV (IQR, 1.7-2.7), respectively).

conclusionsIn both PAF and PerAF, most CFAE and AF-HDF sites did not correspond to the SR-HDF sites or low-voltage area during SR. Thus, most CFAE and DF signals during AF represent functional electrical activities rather than structural remodeling of the atria.

Indexed as

Heart RateAtrial FibrillationDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHeart Conduction SystemHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23179918
OpenAlexW2001999351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.