Trial reportJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2013
Identification of the primary mechanism of action of an insulin secretagogue from meal test data in healthy volunteers based on an integrated glucose-insulin model.
Trial report in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood-glucose Profile Evaluation with a Model-based Approach using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2019Review
- Model-Based Interspecies Scaling of Glucose Homeostasis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017Article
- Implications for Drug Characterization in Glucose Tolerance Tests Without Insulin: Simulation Study of Power and Predictions Using Model-Based Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017Article
- Application of the integrated glucose-insulin model for cross-study characterization of T2DM patients on metformin background treatment.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integrated glucose-insulin (IGI) model is a previously developed semi-mechanistic model that incorporates control mechanisms for the regulation of glucose production, insulin secretion, and glucose uptake. It has been shown to adequately describe insulin and glucose profiles in both type 2 diabetics and healthy volunteers following various glucose tolerance tests. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of the IGI model to correctly identify the primary mechanism of action of glibenclamide (Gb), based on meal tolerance test (MTT) data in healthy volunteers. IGI models with different mechanism of drug action were applied to data from eight healthy volunteers participating in a randomized crossover study with five single-dose tests (placebo and four drug arms). The study participants were given 3.5 mg of Gb, intravenously or orally, or 3.5 mg of the two main metabolites M1 and M2 intravenously, 0.5 h prior to a standardized breakfast with energy content of 1800 kJ. Simultaneous analysis of all data by nonlinear mixed effect modeling was performed using NONMEM(®). Drug effects that increased insulin secretion resulted in the best model fit, thus identifying the primary mechanism of action of Gb and metabolites as insulin secretagogues. The model also quantified the combined effect of Gb, M1 and M2 to have a fourfold maximal increase on endogenous insulin secretion, with an EC(50) of 169.1 ng mL(-1) for Gb, 151.4 ng mL(-1) for M1 and 267.1 ng mL(-1) for M2. The semi-mechanistic IGI model was successfully applied to MTT data and identified the primary mechanism of action for Gb, quantifying its effects on glucose and insulin time profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.