Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179777›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2013

F18-FDG-PET/CT thyroid incidentalomas: a wide retrospective analysis in three Italian centres on the significance of focal uptake and SUV value.

Francesco Bertagna, Giorgio Treglia, Arnoldo Piccardo, Elisabetta Giovannini, Giovanni Bosio, Giorgio Biasiotto, El Khayat Bahij, Roberto Maroldi, Raffaele Giubbini

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Focal Thyroid Incidentalomas onFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Definitions of Incidental [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence of Brain Incidental Lesions Detected byMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiomics Analysis of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesco BertagnaNuclear Medicine, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili di Brescia, P.le Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy. francesco.bertagna@spedalicivili.brescia.it
Giorgio Treglia
Arnoldo Piccardo
Elisabetta Giovannini
Giovanni Bosio
Giorgio Biasiotto
El Khayat Bahij
Roberto Maroldi
Raffaele Giubbini

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid incidental uptake is defined as a thyroid uptake incidentally and newly detected by imaging techniques performed for an unrelated purpose and especially for non-thyroid diseases. Aim of the study was to establish the prevalence and pathological nature of focal thyroid incidentalomas detected at F18-FDG-PET/CT in patients studied for oncological purposes and not for thyroid disease. Secondary end point was to establish a possible maximum standardised uptake value cut-off over which a malignant lesion should be suspected. We have retrospectively evaluated 49519 patients who underwent F18-FDG-PET/CT for oncologic purposes in three Nuclear Medicine Centres (N.1 = 11278, N.2 = 31076, N.3 = 7165). A focal incidental thyroid uptake was diagnosed in 729 (1.5 %) patients (287-39.4 % male and 442-60.6 % female; average age: 65.26). Of 729 thyroid incidentalomas 211 (28.9 %) underwent further investigation to determine the nature of the nodule; 124/211 (58.8 %) incidentalomas were benign, 72/211 (34.1 %) malignant, 4/211 (1.9 %) non-diagnostic at cytological examination in the absence of surgery and histological evaluation and 11/211 (5.2 %) were indeterminate at cytological examination. A centre-based receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis of the patients with a definitive diagnosis was performed to identify a SUVmax cut-off useful in differentiating benign from malignant incidentalomas. In the centre N.1 it was 4.8 (sensitivity = 95.7 %, specificity = 46.4 %, area under the curve = 0.758); 5.3 in the centre N.2 (sensitivity = 76.3 %, specificity = 72.5 %, area under the curve = 0.815); 7 in the centre N.3 (sensitivity = 57.1 %, specificity = 79.3 %, area under the curve = 0.627). F18-FDG-PET/CT thyroid incidentalomas are a relevant diagnostic reality which requires further investigations and clinical management especially considering that, despite mainly benign, approximately one third of focal thyroid uptakes are malignant.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansIncidental FindingsItalyMaleMiddle AgedRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsRetrospective StudiesThyroid GlandThyroid NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.