ArticleArchives of toxicology2013
Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 235 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Changes in Gene Expression.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2026Article
- SOX10 Overexpression Enhances the Oligodendrocyte Lineage Commitment of iOPCs In Vitro by Reshaping Their Chromatin Binding Landscape.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Cytotoxicity Testing: From In Vitro Assays to In Silico Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Multi-omics data-based modeling reveals tumorigenesis- and prognosis-associated genes with clinical potential in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- In vitro models of valproic acid to assess neurodevelopmental toxicity: A scoping review.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- A comparative study of biostatistical pipelines for benchmark concentration modeling ofComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Neural organoids incorporating microglia to assess neuroinflammation and toxicities induced by known developmental neurotoxins.Current research in toxicology · 2025Article
- Avoiding a reproducibility crisis in regulatory toxicology-on the fundamental role of ring trials.Archives of toxicology · 2024Article
- Genetic influences on circulating retinol and its relationship to human health.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- The Future of the Teratogenicity Testing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Review
- The reprotoxic adverse side effects of neurogenic and neuroprotective drugs: current use of human organoid modeling as a potential alternative to preclinical models.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Designs for the simultaneous inference of concentration-response curves.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identification and validation of core genes for type 2 diabetes mellitus by integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Transcriptome-based prediction of drugs, inhibiting cardiomyogenesis in human induced pluripotent stem cells.Cell death discovery · 2023Article
- Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Group I Pulmonary Hypertension Based on Machine Learning and Bioinformatics Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Information sharing in high-dimensional gene expression data for improved parameter estimation in concentration-response modelling.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Neurodevelopmental toxicity assessment of flame retardants using a human DNT in vitro testing battery.Cell biology and toxicology · 2022Article
- Neuronal differentiation pathways and compound-induced developmental neurotoxicity in the human neural progenitor cell test (hNPT) revealed by RNA-seq.Chemosphere · 2022Article
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
38 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and many forms of reproductive toxicity (RT) often manifest themselves in functional deficits that are not necessarily based on cell death, but rather on minor changes relating to cell differentiation or communication. The fields of DNT/RT would greatly benefit from in vitro tests that allow the identification of toxicant-induced changes of the cellular proteostasis, or of its underlying transcriptome network. Therefore, the 'human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived novel alternative test systems (ESNATS)' European commission research project established RT tests based on defined differentiation protocols of hESC and their progeny. Valproic acid (VPA) and methylmercury (MeHg) were used as positive control compounds to address the following fundamental questions: (1) Does transcriptome analysis allow discrimination of the two compounds? (2) How does analysis of enriched transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) and of individual probe sets (PS) distinguish between test systems? (3) Can batch effects be controlled? (4) How many DNA microarrays are needed? (5) Is the highest non-cytotoxic concentration optimal and relevant for the study of transcriptome changes? VPA triggered vast transcriptional changes, whereas MeHg altered fewer transcripts. To attenuate batch effects, analysis has been focused on the 500 PS with highest variability. The test systems differed significantly in their responses (<20 % overlap). Moreover, within one test system, little overlap between the PS changed by the two compounds has been observed. However, using TFBS enrichment, a relatively large 'common response' to VPA and MeHg could be distinguished from 'compound-specific' responses. In conclusion, the ESNATS assay battery allows classification of human DNT/RT toxicants on the basis of their transcriptome profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.