Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179594›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2013

MRI for attenuation correction in PET: methods and challenges.

Gudrun Wagenknecht, Hans-Jürgen Kaiser, Felix M Mottaghy, Hans Herzog

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond CT: Attenuation correction for stand-alone brain PET.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Context-Aware Transformer GAN for Direct Generation of Attenuation and Scatter Corrected PET Data.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Effects of dynamic [Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine image generation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gudrun WagenknechtCentral Institute for Electronics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany. g.wagenknecht@fz-juelich.de
Hans-Jürgen Kaiser
Felix M Mottaghy
Hans Herzog

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In current combined PET/MR systems, PET attenuation correction is based on MRI, since the small bore inside MRI systems and the strong magnetic field do not permit a rotating PET transmission source or a CT device to be integrated. Unlike CT measurements in PET/CT scanners, the MR signal is not directly correlated to tissue density and thus cannot be converted by a simple transformation of intensity values. Various approaches have been developed based on templates, atlas information, direct segmentation of T1-weighted MR images, or segmentation of images from special MR sequences. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches as well as additional challenges will be discussed in this review.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEquipment DesignHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsWhole Body ImagingRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID23179594
PMCPMC3572388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.