ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2012
Pharmacodynamic models for discrete data.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Modelling of NH600001 in Healthy Subjects and Patients Undergoing Gastroscopy.The AAPS journal · 2024Trial
- PharmML in Action: an Interoperable Language for Modeling and Simulation.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017Article
- A survey of new oncology drug approvals in the USA from 2010 to 2015: a focus on optimal dose and related postmarketing activities.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2016Review
- Modeling and simulation of count data.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical outcomes are often described as events: death, stroke, epileptic seizure, multiple sclerosis lesions, recurrence of cancer, disease progression, pain, infection and bacterial/viral eradication, severe toxic adverse effect, resistance to treatment, etc. They may be quantified as time-to-event, counts of events per time interval (rates), their severity grade, or a combination of these. Such data are discrete and require specific modelling structures and methods. This article references the most common modelling approaches for categorical, count and time-to-event data, and reviews examples of such models applied in the analysis of pharmacodynamic data. Modelling is useful for identification of influential factors related to the clinical outcome, characterization and quantification of their impact, for making better informed predictions and clinical decisions, assessments of efficacy of therapeutic interventions, optimizing the individual treatments and drug development studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23179578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.