Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179491›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2013

Online communities for breast cancer survivors: a review and analysis of their characteristics and levels of use.

Jacqueline L Bender, M Carolina Jimenez-Marroquin, Lorraine E Ferris, Joel Katz, Alejandro R Jadad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pre-post analysis of a social capital-based exercise adherence intervention for breast cancer survivors with moderate fatigue: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Taxonomy for Health Information Systems.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. CANCER PAIN AND THERAPY.Acta clinica Croatica · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The role of off-topic discussions in online health support groups: insights from a content analysis of an online rectal cancer group.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacqueline L BenderDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. jbender@ehealthinnovation.org
M Carolina Jimenez-Marroquin
Lorraine E Ferris
Joel Katz
Alejandro R Jadad

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOnline communities have been heralded as one of the most promising health resources on the Internet. The purpose of this study was to identify the characteristics and levels of use of online communities for breast cancer survivors.

methodsUsing Google, we identified websites with a string of computer-mediated communication terms and individual queries of three to five words of online community terms. This was complemented by a review of website resource lists and personal libraries. Two reviewers independently extracted information on their general characteristics and number of members and message board posts. A coding scheme guided content analysis.

resultsWe found 111 websites. Most sites (n = 64, 65.8 %) had a broad focus (e.g., health, cancer, or general). One third (n = 38, 34.2 %) were exclusive to breast cancer and 11 catered to specific disease characteristics. The majority were American (n = 79, 75.2 %), nonprofit (55.0 %), and moderated (69.5 %). Most moderators (85.7 %) were staff or community members; eight sites were moderated by health professionals. Greater than one-third of sites (n = 40, 36 %) were initiated by breast cancer survivors or loved ones. Breast cancer-specific sites contained a total of 4,186,275 posts. One-third (n = 10) contained 93.4 % of posts, displaying over 100,000 posts each. As of April 3, 2012, eight sites were discontinued.

conclusionsThere is a wide range of online communities available for breast cancer survivors with extensive archives of personal illness experiences. Future efforts should focus on identifying the factors that determine their success and effectiveness.

Indexed as

InternetSocial SupportBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansSocial NetworkingSurvivors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.