Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179228›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2013

Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Thomas Baum, Melanie Kutscher, Dirk Müller, Christoph Räth, Felix Eckstein, Eva-Maria Lochmüller, Ernst J Rummeny, Thomas M Link, Jan S Bauer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Assessment of alveolar bone marrow fat content using 15 T MRI.Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of MR-based trabecular bone microstructure analysis at the distal radius for osteoporosis diagnostics: a study in post-menopausal women with breast cancer and treated with aromatase inhibitor.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas BaumKlinikum rechts der Isar, Institut für Radiologie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. thbaum@gmx.de
Melanie Kutscher
Dirk Müller
Christoph Räth
Felix Eckstein
Eva-Maria Lochmüller
Ernst J Rummeny
Thomas M Link
Jan S Bauer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the combination of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based bone mass and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based cortical and trabecular structural measures improves the prediction of radial bone strength. Thirty-eight left forearms were harvested from formalin-fixed human cadavers. Bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the distal radius were measured using DXA. Cortical and trabecular structural measures of the distal radius were computed in high-resolution 1.5T MR images. Cortical measures included average cortical thickness and cross-sectional area. Trabecular measures included morphometric and texture parameters. The forearms were biomechanically tested in a fall simulation to measure absolute radial bone strength (failure load). Relative radial bone strength was determined by dividing radial failure loads by age, body mass index, radius length, and average radius cross-sectional area, respectively. DXA derived BMC and BMD showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlations with absolute and relative radial bone strength (r ≤ 0.78). Correlation coefficients for cortical and trabecular structural measures with absolute and relative radial bone strength amounted up to r = 0.59 and r = 0.74, respectively, (p < 0.05). In combination with DXA-based bone mass, trabecular but not, cortical structural measures, added in multiple regression models significant (p < 0.05) information in predicting absolute and relative radial bone strength (up to R adj = 0.88). Thus, a combination of DXA-based bone mass and MRI-based trabecular structural measures most accurately predicted absolute and relative radial bone strength, whereas structural measures of the cortex did not provide significant additional information in combination with DXA.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonMagnetic Resonance ImagingAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleRadiusRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.