Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179118›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2013

Emerging ideas: Engineering the periosteum: revitalizing allografts by mimicking autograft healing.

Michael D Hoffman, Danielle S W Benoit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Research progress of the role of periosteum in distraction osteogenesis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Extracellular Matrix Revisited: Roles in Tissue Engineering.International neurourology journal · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Engineering clinically relevant volumes of vascularized bone.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael D HoffmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0168, USA.
Danielle S W Benoit

Funding

Tissue Engineering Strategies to Revitalize Bone AllograftsR01AR064200 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Danielle S. Benoit · 2013 to 2026
$4.0M
Training in Orthopaedic Researchhttps://apps.era.nih.gov/grantfolder/viewInternalGF.era?applId=8841318&folderId=90T32AR053459 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ZUSCIK, MICHAEL J · 2006 to 2017
$3.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064200NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR053459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo fulfill the need for large volumes, devitalized allografts are used to treat massive bone defects despite a 60%, 10-year postimplantation fracture rate. Allograft healing is inferior to autografts where the periosteum orchestrates remodeling. HYPOTHESIS: By augmenting allografts with a tissue engineered periosteum consisting of tunable and degradable, poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogels for mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation, the functions critical for periosteum-mediated healing will be identified and emulated. METHOD OF STUDY: PEG hydrogels will be designed to emulate periosteum-mediated autograft healing to revitalize allografts. We will exploit murine femoral defect models for these approaches. Critical-sized, 5-mm segmental defects will be created and filled with decellularized allograft controls or live autograft controls. Alternatively, defects will be treated with our experimental approaches: decellularized allografts coated with MSCs transplanted via degradable PEG hydrogels to mimic progenitor cell densities and persistence during autograft healing. Healing will be evaluated for 9 weeks using microcomputed tomography, mechanical testing, and histologic analysis. If promising, MSC densities, hydrogel compositions, and genetic methods will be used to isolate critical aspects of engineered periosteum that modulate healing. Finally, hydrogel biochemical characteristics will be altered to initiate MSC and/or host-material interactions to further promote remodeling of allografts. SIGNIFICANCE: This approach represents a novel tissue engineering strategy whereby degradable, synthetic hydrogels will be exploited to emulate the periosteum. The microenvironment, which will mediate MSC transplantation, will use tunable PEG hydrogels for isolation of critical allograft revitalization factors. In addition, hydrogels will be modified with biochemical cues to further augment allografts to reduce or eliminate revision surgeries associated with allograft failures.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationOsseointegrationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone TransplantationDisease Models, AnimalFemoral FracturesHydrogelsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOrthopedicsPeriosteumPolyethylene GlycolsTime FactorsHydrogelsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID23179118
PMCPMC3563810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.