Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23179020›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2013

Predictive data mining on monitoring data from the intensive care unit.

Fabian Güiza, Jelle Van Eyck, Geert Meyfroidt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hypotension Risk Prediction via Sequential Contrast Patterns of ICU Blood Pressure.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2016
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabian GüizaDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Leuven (KU Leuven), Belgium Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. fabian.guiza@med.kuleuven.be
Jelle Van Eyck
Geert Meyfroidt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread implementation of computerized medical files in intensive care units (ICUs) over recent years has made available large databases of clinical data for the purpose of developing clinical prediction models. The typical intensive care unit has several information sources from which data is electronically collected as time series of varying time resolutions. We present an overview of research questions studied in the ICU setting that have been addressed through the automatic analysis of these large databases. We focus on automatic learning methods, specifically data mining approaches for predictive modeling based on these time series of clinical data. On the one hand we examine short and medium term predictions, which have as ultimate goal the development of early warning or decision support systems. On the other hand we examine long term outcome prediction models and evaluate their performance with respect to established scoring systems based on static admission and demographic data.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremCritical CareData MiningDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMonitoring, PhysiologicPatient AdmissionPrognosisRiskTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.