ArticleExperimental brain research2013
Tetrodotoxin-resistant fibres and spinal Fos expression: differences between input from muscle and skin.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The nAChR Chaperone TMEM35a (NACHO) Contributes to the Development of Hyperalgesia in Mice.Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nociceptive information from muscle and skin is differently processed at many levels of the central nervous system. In most articles on this issue, noxious stimuli were used that also excited non-nociceptive receptors. The effects of a pure nociceptive input from muscle or skin on spinal neurones are largely unknown. The aim of the study was to find out whether the Fos-protein expression in dorsal horn neurones induced by an exclusively nociceptive muscle input differs from that of the skin. Fos-proteins are transcription factors that regulate neuronal gene expression and induce neuroplastic effects that are involved in the development of chronic pain. A pure nociceptive input was achieved by tetrodotoxin (TTX) that is known to block all TTX-sensitive afferents and leave the TTX-resistant (TTX-r), presumably nociceptive, afferent fibres intact. We studied the c-Fos and FosB expression in the spinal cord following electrical stimulation of TTX-r afferent fibres in the gastrocnemius-soleus nerve (muscle) and compared it to the sural nerve (skin). In the spinal dorsal horn, the main effect of a TTX-r input from muscle was an increase in FosB (P < 0.05), but not in c-Fos expression (P = 0.51). In contrast, an input from the skin induced both FosB (P < 0.01) and c-Fos expression (P < 0.05). The data indicate that in the spinal, dorsal horn nociceptive input from skin and muscle has different effects on the Fos expression. The only effect of muscle input was an increase in FosB expression while skin input increased both c-Fos and FosB expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.