ArticleDer Radiologe2012
[Treatment of high grade intracranial stenoses].
Article in Der Radiologe, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial stenosis is the cause of 10 % of strokes. Besides medicinal treatment, intracranial bypass surgery, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting are available treatment approaches. According to the 2005 published WASID trial antiplatelets should be preferred to oral anticoagulation in secondary preventive therapy of ischemic stroke; however patients with high grade intracranial stenosis still have a poor prognosis. Intracranial bypass surgery, which was taken into account as a treatment option even in 1985, showed a generally worse outcome in relation to medicinal therapy. Intracranial angioplasty and stenting, representing improvements in endovascular treatment, were proven to be effective and feasible treatment approaches for patients with symptomatic high grade intracranial stenosis. Within the scope of the SAMMPRIS trial published in 2011, which propagated an advantage of aggressive medicinal treatment versus endovascular therapy, a retrospective study was performed at the department of neuroradiology of the Homburg University of Saarland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23178786What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.