Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23178669›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2013

Tackling the minority: sulfate-reducing bacteria in an archaea-dominated subsurface biofilm.

Alexander J Probst, Hoi-Ying N Holman, Todd Z DeSantis, Gary L Andersen, Giovanni Birarda, Hans A Bechtel, Yvette M Piceno, Maria Sonnleitner, Kasthuri Venkateswaran, Christine Moissl-Eichinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Progress and Challenges in Studying the Ecophysiology of Archaea.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Lipid analysis of COThe ISME journal · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dynamic Dispersal of Surface Layer Biofilm Induced by Nanosized TiOApplied and environmental microbiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander J ProbstInstitute for Microbiology and Archaea Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hoi-Ying N Holman
Todd Z DeSantis
Gary L Andersen
Giovanni Birarda
Hans A Bechtel
Yvette M Piceno
Maria Sonnleitner
Kasthuri Venkateswaran
Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Regensburg · DEJet Propulsion Laboratory · USSecond Genome (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Archaea are usually minor components of a microbial community and dominated by a large and diverse bacterial population. In contrast, the SM1 Euryarchaeon dominates a sulfidic aquifer by forming subsurface biofilms that contain a very minor bacterial fraction (5%). These unique biofilms are delivered in high biomass to the spring outflow that provides an outstanding window to the subsurface. Despite previous attempts to understand its natural role, the metabolic capacities of the SM1 Euryarchaeon remain mysterious to date. In this study, we focused on the minor bacterial fraction in order to obtain insights into the ecological function of the biofilm. We link phylogenetic diversity information with the spatial distribution of chemical and metabolic compounds by combining three different state-of-the-art methods: PhyloChip G3 DNA microarray technology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and synchrotron radiation-based Fourier transform infrared (SR-FTIR) spectromicroscopy. The results of PhyloChip and FISH technologies provide evidence for selective enrichment of sulfate-reducing bacteria, which was confirmed by the detection of bacterial dissimilatory sulfite reductase subunit B (dsrB) genes via quantitative PCR and sequence-based analyses. We further established a differentiation of archaeal and bacterial cells by SR-FTIR based on typical lipid and carbohydrate signatures, which demonstrated a co-localization of organic sulfate, carbonated mineral and bacterial signatures in the biofilm. All these results strongly indicate an involvement of the SM1 euryarchaeal biofilm in the global cycles of sulfur and carbon and support the hypothesis that sulfidic springs are important habitats for Earth's energy cycles. Moreover, these investigations of a bacterial minority in an Archaea-dominated environment are a remarkable example of the great power of combining highly sensitive microarrays with label-free infrared imaging.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiodiversityBiofilmsArchaeaBacteriaDNA, BacterialHydrogensulfite ReductaseIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceNatural SpringsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredDNA, BacterialHydrogensulfite ReductaseRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23178669
PMCPMC3578563
OpenAlexW2093842155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.