Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23178448›Full record

ReviewCancer letters2013

Genomic sequencing in cancer.

Musaffe Tuna, Christopher I Amos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer letters, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Next-generation sequencing for lung cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Musaffe TunaDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: mtuna9@gmail.com.
Christopher I Amos
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL)U19CA148127 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2010 to 2014
$10.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic sequencing has provided critical insights into the etiology of both simple and complex diseases. The enormous reductions in cost for whole genome sequencing have allowed this technology to gain increasing use. Whole genome analysis has impacted research of complex diseases including cancer by allowing the systematic analysis of entire genomes in a single experiment, thereby facilitating the discovery of somatic and germline mutations, and identification of the insertions, deletions, and structural rearrangements, including translocations and inversions, in novel disease genes. Whole-genome sequencing can be used to provide the most comprehensive characterization of the cancer genome, the complexity of which we are only beginning to understand. Hence in this review, we focus on whole-genome sequencing in cancer.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyDNA Mutational AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansMutationNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCancerMutationsStructural rearrangementsWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID23178448
PMCPMC3622788
OpenAlexW2124624913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.