Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23177601›Full record

ReviewClinics in geriatric medicine2013

Emergency department observation units and the older patient.

Mark G Moseley, Miles P Hawley, Jeffrey M Caterino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in geriatric medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nonspecific complaints in the emergency department - a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effects of a Geriatric Emergency Department Multidisciplinary Intervention on Functional Status and Quality of Life: A Pre/Post Cohort Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark G MoseleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43035, USA.
Miles P Hawley
Jeffrey M Caterino
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Expanding antimicrobial stewardship for long term care facility patients:ImplemenK23AG038351 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CATERINO, JEFFREY M · 2010 to 2014
$739k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG038351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of emergency departments (EDs) are providing extended care and monitoring of patients in ED observation units (EDOUs). EDOUs can be useful for older adults as an alternative to hospitalization and as a means of risk stratification for older adults with unclear presentations. They can also provide a period of therapeutic intervention and reassessment for older patients in whom the appropriateness and safety of immediate outpatient care are unclear. This article discusses the general characteristics of EDOUs, reviews appropriate entry and exclusion criteria for older adults in EDOUs, and discusses regulatory implications of observation status for patients with Medicare.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHospital UnitsHumansMedicareMiddle AgedObservationPatient SelectionUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23177601
PMCPMC3810312
OpenAlexW2089257099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.