Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23177172›Full record

ReviewDigestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver2013

Liver carcinogenesis: rodent models of hepatocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma.

Samuele De Minicis, Tatiana Kisseleva, Heather Francis, Gianluca Svegliati Baroni, Antonio Benedetti, David Brenner, Domenico Alvaro, Gianfranco Alpini, Marco Marzioni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of the Polar Fraction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Selecting an Appropriate Experimental Animal Model for Cholangiocarcinoma Research.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuele De MinicisDepartment of Gastroenterology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Tatiana Kisseleva
Heather Francis
Gianluca Svegliati Baroni
Antonio Benedetti
David Brenner
Domenico Alvaro
Gianfranco Alpini
Marco Marzioni
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of California, San Diego · USSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

GROWTH REGULATION OF THE INTRAHEPATIC BILIARY TREER01DK054811 · NIDDK · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ALPINI, GIANFRANCO D, GLASER, SHANNON STROUD · 2000 to 2021
$3.8M
TNF ALPHA AND IMPAIRED WOUND HEALING OF CACHEXIA XIAR01GM041804 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRENNER, DAVID A. · 1989 to 2013
$3.4M
Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation induced by Hepatitis C VirusR01AA015055 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BRENNER, DAVID A · 2003 to 2007
$1.9M
Regulation of Bile Duct Growth in Bile Duct Ligated RatsR01DK062975 · NIDDK · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ALPINI, GIANFRANCO D, GLASER, SHANNON STROUD · 2005 to 2014
$1.9M
Role of Sensory Neuropeptides in the Regulation of Biliary FunctionR01DK076898 · NIDDK · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ALPINI, GIANFRANCO D, GLASER, SHANNON STROUD · 2008 to 2016
$1.8M
TOWARD THE OPTIMAL TIMING OF INITIATION OF DIALYSISR01DK058411 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHERTOW, GLENN MATTHEW · 2001 to 2003
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015055NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054811NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058411NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062975NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK076898NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM041804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma are primary liver cancers, both represent a growing challenge for clinicians due to their increasing morbidity and mortality. In the last few years a number of in vivo models of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma have been developed. The study of these models is providing a significant contribution in unveiling the pathophysiology of primary liver malignancies. They are also fundamental tools to evaluate newly designed molecules to be tested as new potential therapeutic agents in a pre-clinical set. Technical aspects of each model are critical steps, and they should always be considered in order to appropriately interpret the findings of a study or its planning. The purpose of this review is to describe the technical and experimental features of the most significant rodent models, highlighting similarities or differences between the corresponding human diseases. The first part is dedicated to the discussion of models of hepatocellular carcinoma, developed using toxic agents, or through dietary or genetic manipulations. In the second we will address models of cholangiocarcinoma developed in rats or mice by toxin administration, genetic manipulation and/or bile duct incannulation or surgery. Xenograft or syngenic models are also proposed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell Transformation, NeoplasticCholangiocarcinomaHumansLiver Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceRatsTransplantation, Heterologous

Identifiers

PMID23177172
PMCPMC3716909
OpenAlexW2035087003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.