Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23177115›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR2012

Spontaneous tumor regression in a syngeneic rat model of liver cancer: implications for survival studies.

Manon Buijs, Jean-Francois H Geschwind, Labiq H Syed, Shanmugasundaram Ganapathy-Kanniappan, Rani Kunjithapatham, Joost W Wijlemans, Byung Kook Kwak, Shinichi Ota, Mustafa Vali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Segmental Transarterial Embolization in a Translational Rat Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manon BuijsRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,600 N. Wolfe St., Blalock 545, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Jean-Francois H Geschwind
Labiq H Syed
Shanmugasundaram Ganapathy-Kanniappan
Rani Kunjithapatham
Joost W Wijlemans
Byung Kook Kwak
Shinichi Ota
Mustafa Vali

Funding

Training for Clinician Scientists in Imaging ResearchT32EB006351 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POMPER, MARTIN G · 2006 to 2022
$4.0M
Therapy for Liver Cancer by Targeting Energy MetabolismR01CA100883 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GESCHWIND, JEAN-FRANCOIS H · 2005 to 2007
$797k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100883NIBIB NIH HHS T32 5T32EB006351-05NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB006351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize tumor growth of N1S1 cells implanted into the liver of Sprague-Dawley rats to determine if this model could be used for survival studies. These results were compared with tumor growth after implantation with McA-RH7777 cells. MATERIALS AND

methodsN1S1 or McA-RH7777 cells were implanted into the liver of Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 20 and n = 12, respectively) using ultrasound (US) guidance, and tumor growth was followed by using US. Serum profiles of 19 cytokines were compared in naive versus tumor-bearing rats.

resultsBoth types of tumors were visible on US 1 week after tumor implantation, but the mean tumor volume of N1S1 tumors was larger compared to McA-RH7777 tumors (231 mm(3) vs 82.3 mm(3), respectively). Tumor volumes in both groups continued to increase, reaching means of 289 mm(3) and 160 mm(3) in N1S1 and McA-RH7777 groups, respectively, 2 weeks after tumor implantation. By week 3, tumor volumes had decreased considerably, and six tumors (50%) in the McA-RH7777 had spontaneously regressed, versus two (10%) in the N1S1 group. Tumor volumes continued to decrease over the following 3 weeks, and complete tumor regression of all tumors was seen 5 weeks and 6 weeks after tumor implantation in the McA-RH7777 and N1S1 groups, respectively. In an N1S1-implanted rat, multiple cytokines that have been shown to correlate with the ability of the tumor to survive in a hostile environment were increased by as much as 50%, whereas the average increase in cytokine levels was 90%. These findings suggest that the net cytokine environment favors an antitumor immune response. A similar trend was observed in a rat with a McA-RH7777 tumor, and the increase in cytokine levels was considerably more pronounced, with an average increase of 320%.

conclusionsThe model of N1S1 cell implantation in the liver of Sprague-Dawley rats is not ideal for survival studies and should only be used with great caution in short-term studies that involve cancer therapies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalNeoplasm Regression, SpontaneousAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasms, ExperimentalRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySurvival AnalysisSurvival RateTransplantation, IsogeneicUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID23177115
PMCPMC3548324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.