Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23176545›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012

Statistical characterization of multiple-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) assays for quantitative proteomics.

D R Mani, Susan E Abbatiello, Steven A Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D R ManiThe Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA. manidr@broad.mit.edu
Susan E Abbatiello
Steven A Carr

Funding

Measuring Cancer Biomarker Candidates by Targeted MS and Ab EnrichmentU24CA126476 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CARR, STEVEN A · 2006 to 2010
$14.6M
A Platform for Pattern-Based Proteomic Biomarker Discovery-R01R01CA126219 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MANI, DENKANIKOTA R · 2006 to 2009
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA126219NCI NIH HHS U24CA126476PHS HHS HHSN268201000033C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) with stable isotope dilution (SID) is increasingly becoming a widely accepted assay for the quantification of proteins and peptides. These assays have shown great promise in relatively high throughput verification of candidate biomarkers. While the use of MRM-MS assays is well established in the small molecule realm, their introduction and use in proteomics is relatively recent. As such, statistical and computational methods for the analysis of MRM-MS data from proteins and peptides are still being developed. Based on our extensive experience with analyzing a wide range of SID-MRM-MS data, we set forth a methodology for analysis that encompasses significant aspects ranging from data quality assessment, assay characterization including calibration curves, limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), and measurement of intra- and interlaboratory precision. We draw upon publicly available seminal datasets to illustrate our methods and algorithms.

Indexed as

BiomarkersData Interpretation, StatisticalIndicator Dilution TechniquesIsotopesLimit of DetectionMass SpectrometryPeptidesProteinsProteomicsBiomarkersIsotopesPeptidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID23176545
PMCPMC3489552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.