ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012
False discovery rates in spectral identification.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed.
- False Discovery Estimation in Record Linkage.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- The Secret of Secrets: Carbonic Anhydrase Concentration in Lizards' Femoral Gland Secretions Is Tuned to Environmental Conditions.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Synergistic Arg-C Ultra and Lys-C Digestion for Quantitative Proteomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Assessment of false discovery rate control in tandem mass spectrometry analysis using entrapment.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Disentangling effects of the DR and DQ isomers encoded by the HLA class II haplotype DRB1*15:01/DQB1*06:02 to help establish the true risk allele for FVIII inhibitor development in Hemophilia A.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Proteomics Can Rise to the Challenge of Pseudogenes' Coding Nature.Journal of proteome research · 2024Review
- Integrative Multi-PTM Proteomics Reveals Dynamic Global, Redox, Phosphorylation, and Acetylation Regulation in Cytokine-Treated Pancreatic Beta Cells.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024Article
- PgxSAVy: A tool for comprehensive evaluation of variant peptide quality in proteogenomics - catching the (un)usual suspects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Machine learning-enhanced immunopeptidomics applied to T-cell epitope discovery for COVID-19 vaccines.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Reliability of plastid and mitochondrial localisation prediction declines rapidly with the evolutionary distance to the training set increasing.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Identification of old coding regions disproves the hominoid de novo status of genes.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- metaExpertPro: A Computational Workflow for Metaproteomics Spectral Library Construction and Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024Article
- APIR: Aggregating Universal Proteomics Database Search Algorithms for Peptide Identification with FDR Control.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Article
- An algorithm for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in XL-MS/MS proteomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Newfound Coding Potential of Transcripts Unveils Missing Members of Human Protein Communities.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Recent advances in mass spectrometry analysis of neuropeptides.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2023Review
- Overview and considerations in bottom-up proteomics.The Analyst · 2023Review
- Critical evaluation of the use of artificial data for machine learning basedComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- False discovery rate estimation using candidate peptides for each spectrum.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated database search engines are one of the fundamental engines of high-throughput proteomics enabling daily identifications of hundreds of thousands of peptides and proteins from tandem mass (MS/MS) spectrometry data. Nevertheless, this automation also makes it humanly impossible to manually validate the vast lists of resulting identifications from such high-throughput searches. This challenge is usually addressed by using a Target-Decoy Approach (TDA) to impose an empirical False Discovery Rate (FDR) at a pre-determined threshold x% with the expectation that at most x% of the returned identifications would be false positives. But despite the fundamental importance of FDR estimates in ensuring the utility of large lists of identifications, there is surprisingly little consensus on exactly how TDA should be applied to minimize the chances of biased FDR estimates. In fact, since less rigorous TDA/FDR estimates tend to result in more identifications (at higher 'true' FDR), there is often little incentive to enforce strict TDA/FDR procedures in studies where the major metric of success is the size of the list of identifications and there are no follow up studies imposing hard cost constraints on the number of reported false positives. Here we address the problem of the accuracy of TDA estimates of empirical FDR. Using MS/MS spectra from samples where we were able to define a factual FDR estimator of 'true' FDR we evaluate several popular variants of the TDA procedure in a variety of database search contexts. We show that the fraction of false identifications can sometimes be over 10× higher than reported and may be unavoidably high for certain types of searches. In addition, we further report that the two-pass search strategy seems the most promising database search strategy. While unavoidably constrained by the particulars of any specific evaluation dataset, our observations support a series of recommendations towards maximizing the number of resulting identifications while controlling database searches with robust and reproducible TDA estimation of empirical FDR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.